- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Improve Your Security Posture with
Threat Prevention and Policy Insights
Overlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hello everyone, I would like to ask for your help/insight regarding a few problems I have encountered while trying to install an SMS on an OpenServer.
USB Drive: Kingston DataTraveler 104, 32GB, USB 2.0
OpenServer: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S8
Problem Description:
The USB-drive is seen as a valid storage device to install GAIA on. Whenever I remove the USB-drive and let it index for drives to only continue with the intended drive, then I receive a handful of errors that result in the immediate termination of the installation process. Pictures related.
It doesn't appear possible to me to naturally deselect the USB-drive. The installation proceeded without error if I let the USB-drive become part of the filesystem as /sdb.
From my own lab environment, I am unable to find out how to deselect a drive, and they appear to form a raid:0 during the start of the installation. Lab pictures related.
This would explain why the installation of the SMS on the OpenServer is now unstable without the USB-drive with errors such as infinite loading CPUSE and session termination upon clicking the network management tab within the WebUI.
Perhaps unrelated, but whenever a boot option was chosen, the server would reply with error i8042 no controller found.
I would like some insight into what is going on, or if I have made a mistake. It would be helpful to know what the actual ISOMorphic requirements are that are not listed with the product description. Did my USB-drive has too much storage capacity, and if so, then what is the recommended limit?
Thank you for taking the time to offer me some insight.
"Solved" the problem with the help of colleagues and TAC.
We followed the following sk92442 and managed to repair the filesystem to a degree that it was able to run CPUSE. Following that we reinstalled R81.10 via CPUSE and managed to have a working installation.
The alternative for us would have been to perform a DVD installation. I hope this comment can be helpful to someone in the future encountering a similar problem.
Thank you all for your input, it is much appreciated!
Looks like the issue from sk100566: Gaia OS clean install from USB device fails - you need TAC to provide a fix !
Does not appear there is a specific hotfix for doing this on open servers. For CP appliances, says it was fixed in R77.20, which is long time unsupported.
Andy
Gaia OS installer (Anaconda) includes the USB installation media as part of the installation target. There is no way to "un-select" the USB drive from the target drive list.
I can see this as a limitation until R80.40, and sk100566 is for:
| Version | R77.30 (EOL), R80.10 (EOL), R80.20 (EOL), R80.30 (EOL), R80.40, R81, R81.10, R81.20 |
instructions when Gaia OS clean install from USB device fails on Open Server
Issue ID: 01884161
Contact Check Point Support to get a Hotfix for this issue - improved ISO (only non-removable (local) discs will be used in the install process).
A Support Engineer will make sure the Hotfix is compatible with your environment before providing the Hotfix.
I see what you are saying, though in original sk and also 2 links included, it lists all versions up to R81.20. Maybe best to get in touch with TAC @HansKazan and verify this.
Andy
A search for the
Issue ID: 01884161
will show it in known limitations for versions up to R80.40. It still is Anaconda, see errors above...
True true, so I agree with your suggestion, definitely best to open TAC case to verify.
Andy
"Solved" the problem with the help of colleagues and TAC.
We followed the following sk92442 and managed to repair the filesystem to a degree that it was able to run CPUSE. Following that we reinstalled R81.10 via CPUSE and managed to have a working installation.
The alternative for us would have been to perform a DVD installation. I hope this comment can be helpful to someone in the future encountering a similar problem.
Thank you all for your input, it is much appreciated!
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 15 | |
| 8 | |
| 8 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 |
Wed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasWed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY