- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hi all,
I am seeing a lot of “Connection terminated before detection: Insufficient data.” and “Connection terminated before detection: No SSL applicative data.“ and the matched rule “CPNotEnoughDataForRuleMatch” on my gateway and it worries me a little.
When I perform a simple search for logs with those fields in combination in our SIEM in 24 hour time frame I get quite a lot as seen below:
I've checked out the sk113479 and it states that: “No fix is required. This behavior is by design.”, but I still find it a bit odd.
Below is an actual log from the gateway:
And the matched rule:
The gateway seems to work as it should, but it just seems as a fairly large amount of hits and I’m just worried we have some kind of misconfiguration on our gateway.
Appliance is 6400 running 81.20 Take 84.
Any comments or ideas are welcome!
Thanks.
I know it sounds odd, but it is 100% normal.
Refer to below.
Andy
https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Security-Gateways/CPNotEnoughDataForRuleMatch/m-p/198942#M37254
https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Security-Gateways/weird-behaviour/m-p/220375
The reason this occurs is simple: some level of rulebase matching must occur on the first packet.
All you know from the initial TCP SYN for policy matching purposes is:
Knowing the exact applications used requires allowing some additional packets after the three-way handshake.
If the connection terminates before that determination is done (usually doesn't take more than a few packets), you'll see this error.
Like the SK says, it's perfectly normal, expected behavior.
Here is, in my opinion, the BEST explanation for it, provided by @Bob_Zimmerman in 2nd link I gave you.
Andy
This message means the firewall isn't the problem. It allowed the SYN, but the connection was closed for some other reason before the firewall could see the website or application being attempted.
This is almost always because the server didn't respond with a SYN-ACK.
Okay, thanks to you both. That calms my nerves a lot 🙂
So in your opinion I shouldn't be alarmed about the amount logs regarding this either? We're a company of around 650 internal users.
I dont think you should be.
Andy
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| 19 | |
| 19 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Tue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY