Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

R81.10 New Recommended Jumbo - Take #170

eranzo
Employee
Employee
0 10 501

eranzo_0-1730723814828.png

Hi All,

R81.10 Jumbo HF Take #170 is now our Recommended Jumbo take and is available for download to all via CPUSE (as recommended) and via Jumbo documentation (R81.10

A full list of resolved issues can be found in the Jumbo documentation ( R81.10

 

Note:

  • Central Deployment allows you to perform a batch deployment of Hotfixes on your Security Gateways and clusters from SmartConsole!! For more information, see sk168597.
  • With Blink images, you can upgrade your environment to the required Major version including its recommended Jumbo hotfix in one Step, using a single image file.

You can install Blink images using CPUSE – More details can be found in sk120193

 

Thanks,

Release Operations Group

 

10 Comments
the_rock
Legend
Legend

Hopefully at this point, most people are on R81.20. But, I read the notes about that jumbo, excellent work.

Andy

Will_H
Contributor

Take 170 in our lab testing had issues with VSX cluster health. Upgrading to the new take 171 fixed it for us. My guess it had to do with 

PRJ-58111, PMTR-102962 in the release notes.

the_rock
Legend
Legend

@Will_H 100% thats correct. TAC actually confirmed it for customer I worked with that had same problem.

Magnus-Holmberg
Advisor

Having issues with failover all over the place in large VSX clusters, to have this as recommended is just crazy.

the_rock
Legend
Legend

@Magnus-Holmberg 

I do see below in take 171, though nothing specific about failovers 😞

Andy

 

Screenshot_1.png

Magnus-Holmberg
Advisor

Yes we installed HFA169 instead when we did see the forum post.
But before that we had failovers every 10 seconds or so on multiple VS in a 50 VS, VSX Cluster.
Causing very high CPU loads and not funny things.

the_rock
Legend
Legend

Wow, every 10 seconds, thats terrible : - (

Lets hope its fixed soon.

Andy

Magnus-Holmberg
Advisor

yes and HFA130 that we where on before upgrade to HFA170 takes 1hour and 5min before the VS start to starts.
In this HFA169 they starts to start after 3min and then all done after about 40min. (with 50VS)

Arne_Boettger
Collaborator

I share your observations regarding startup times in R81.10 with many VSes - we have about 40, and while it used to take up to 45 Minutes until all VSes were started, now it seems like all are started in parallel, causing high load and sometimes strange temporary lockups.

Currently, we are using three OpenServers, I am curious how it will behave once we switch to two Appliances next year.

Magnus-Holmberg
Advisor

yes it feels like when check point is testing the software they use 10-15vs because that works without an issue.
issues starts when going above 25-30vs, 

Not sure if appliances act differently, we uses openservers for all big vsx systems.

Labels