- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Maestro Masters
- :
- Re: Upgrade, Maestro, R80.20SP -> R81.10
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Upgrade, Maestro, R80.20SP -> R81.10
Hi,
Have anyone tried this task successfully yet ?
We did one try yesterday and ended up with having to revert. Following the guide with all the correct patches. (the .315, the upgrade script..etc)
Anyone done this with success that has some tips n tricks ?
We pretty much halted while trying to fetch the policy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The comment suggests he's running R81.20.
"It's supposed to work and be supported running R81.20 Maestro, but Site 2 would be stuck in down state unless I disabled this feature"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Indeed, it's running R81.20 + JHF Take 14.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I had a couple issues when we upgraded from R80.30 to R80.40+ or 2.6 to 3.10 for Dynamic balancing and multiqueue.
What I do is disable the feature that I know can create a collision , upgrade and check how is the new feature on upgraded version.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
We ended up testing a clean installation. All appliances clean installed using R81.20 for Scalable Platform ISO (T631), and both Orchestrators clean installed using R81.20 for Scalable Platform ISO (T631). I ended up simply dropping CoreXL Split / Dynamic Balancing. The feature isn't hugely beneficial on CPAP-SG6600 (Site 1) and CPAP-SG6500 (Site 2) appliances.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
with 8 logical cores, there are still cases where you'd need the dynamic allocation, when SND cores become loaded, can you elaborate?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Simon, it's been a couple years since the original thread post here and was curious if the issue regarding LACP has been fixed for R81.20 upgrades or is that being reserved for R81.30+? Thank you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This limitation is still present per the SK. I don't have a way to check whether the verifier script has been updated sorry.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »