- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
AI Security Masters E7:
How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for You
Blueprint Architecture for Securing
The AI Factory & AI Data Center
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
Good, Better, Best:
Prioritizing Defenses Against Credential Abuse
Ink Dragon: A Major Nation-State Campaign
Watch HereCheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Hi everyone,
I’m dealing with a persistent Identity Awareness issue on R82 (JHF60). I would appreciate help verifying whether this is a configuration issue, cache issue, or a known IA bug.
For several users located in specific /28 networks, PDP correctly detects both machine and user identity, but PEP does not register the corresponding network segment, and therefore the identity is never pushed to the PEP.
Symptoms:
PDP sees user + machine, roles, AD groups.
PDP shows that the /28 subnet is registered on 2 gateways.
PEP does NOT show this /28 in pep show network registration.
As a result, traffic from these users triggers Captive Portal redirects, even though the Identity Agent is installed and AD identities are valid.
This happens only on some subnets (e.g., 10.xx.xx.14/28), while others (e.g., 10.xx.xx.16/28) work correctly.
This already affected several users across different subnets (10.xx.xx.13, 10.xx.x.103, 10.xx.xx.67).
→ No change; PEP still does not show the /28 subnet.
→ PDP load resolved, cache no longer full.
→ Issue persists.
→ No new entries in pepd.elg related to this network range.
→ Identity still not propagated to PEP.
→ PEP falls back to Captive Portal (“Redirect to CaptivePortal”), showing identity was not mapped.
Checked sk63264, but symptoms do not fully match.
pdp network info → PDP knows the /28
pdp network registered → PDP thinks the PEP is registered
pdp monitor ip X.Y.Z.14 → user + machine identity present, published to the correct gateway
pep show network registration → no entry for the /28 subnet
→ This is the core issue.
Possible incorrect identity-sharing registry state (PDP believes PEP registered, PEP does not)
Identity Cache Mode in R82 holding PEP in a “no identity for this subnet” cached state
Rare identity sharing bug similar to sk134054
Misalignment of registration paging (registered_users_page_size, though not modified)
PEP cutting the identity because the network is not mapped
Has anyone seen a situation where PDP shows a registered subnet, but PEP never lists it?
Could Identity Cache Mode in R82 preserve a “broken” or empty network registration state?
How do you properly force a full rebuild of PEP network registrations, beyond pep cache clear and pdp control full_update?
Is the "inx invalid type (0)" error in diagnostics a sign of an underlying identity sharing issue?
Is this consistent with any known IA bugs affecting PDP→PEP propagation in R82/JHF?
Any recommended debug flags for pepd/pdpd specifically targeting network registration failures?
Happy to share more logs (pepd.elg, pdpd.elg, SmartConsole logs) if needed.
Thanks in advance for any hints or experience!
Have you tried restarting pepd?
https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk97638
Apologies, just saw in your post that you did...you dont see anything related to this in the debug? Mind attaching it here?
Yes, I tried restarting pepd, see topic.
Right, my apologies...are you able to upload the debug and provide affected IP/subnet? I would be happy to review it offline.
By the way, what does below show?
pep show network registration
I'm sitting in the waiting room at the doctor's and haven't read everything, but I always do this for debugging.
before:
fw debug fwd off PDP_LOG_SIZE=50000000
fw debug fwd off PDP_NUM_LOGS=20
fw debug fwd off PEP_LOG_SIZE=50000000
fw debug fwd off PEP_NUM_LOGS=20
fw kill pdpd
fw kill pepd
after
fw debug fwd off PDP_LOG_SIZE=10000000
fw debug fwd off PDP_NUM_LOGS=10
fw debug fwd off PEP_LOG_SIZE=10000000
fw debug fwd off PEP_NUM_LOGS=10
fw kill pdpd
fw kill pepd
Sorry, this was only the part to set log size and number of rotations. Will have to search for the debug commands
There is link for pep debug in below link.
https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk97638
Ah, thank you! I would also adjust the rotation and loh size as I mentioned above, because otherwise, depending on the scenario, the essential information can quickly be overwritten.
Totally. Personally though, I always like to verify those things with TAC, though Im extra careful when it comes to kernel debugs.
I totally understand, it's so important to be super careful when debugging, and I really recommend getting in touch with TAC if you don't have CP staff available all the time.
100% safest thing to do. Please get well mate.
As I did pdpd/pepd debug many times b4 I would just do it. 😉
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 8 | |
| 8 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
Tue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementTue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFTue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY