Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
reybanger
Contributor

R82 Upgrade Failed Error HV000028: Unexpected exception during isValid call.

Hello CheckMates,

I am seeking some help on the topic of Checkpoint R81.20 JHF 118 > R82  inline upgrade in Azure. 

I have been attempting to perform inline upgrade on Azure-hosted management, however run into weird issues.

Import of one of the domains into Multi-Domain Management failed with the following error:
HV000028: Unexpected exception during isValid call.

This interrupted the whole import of the Management Database. 

 

TAC doesnt know yet. Anyone have seen something like this?

Checked few SKs, one mentioned objects that contains omre than 32k of objects, but that is not the case. I do not have so many object in any group.

 

Appreciate any guidance 

CPM log shows errors like this: 

17/01/26 15:23:43,353  INFO upgrade.ngmImport.ImportTask [upgradeTaskExecutor-5]: getting foldersPerDomain for domain :: e644a839-573c-4c56-a9c2-44ecdf5acfff
17/01/26 15:23:43,353  INFO upgrade.ngmImport.ImportTask [upgradeTaskExecutor-5]: object 60b15fda-5bb0-4f60-969e-9207efeb6d32 is default object

17/01/26 15:23:43,353  INFO upgrade.ngmImport.ImportTask [upgradeTaskExecutor-5]: Updating 1 objects from class class com.checkpoint.objects.grc.dummy.CpmiGrcInterpreter

17/01/26 15:23:43,355 ERROR mgmt_blade.objects.DomainUtils [upgradeTaskExecutor-5]: Failed to check if we are in SMC or MDS java.lang.InterruptedException

      at java.lang.Object.waitImpl(Native Method)

      at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:248)

      at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:187)

      at java.lang.UNIXProcess.waitFor(UNIXProcess.java:441)

      at com.checkpoint.management.mgmt_blade.objects.DomainUtils.isMultiDomain(DomainUtils.java:17)

      at com.checkpoint.objects.compliance.CpmiGrcInterpreterMirrorFactory.shouldMirror(CpmiGrcInterpreterMirrorFactory.java:488)

      at com.checkpoint.management.dleserver.coresvc.internal.mirror.MirrorObjectManager.createMirrorMessage_aroundBody16(MirrorObjectManager.java:516)

      at com.checkpoint.management.dleserver.coresvc.internal.mirror.MirrorObjectManager$AjcClosure17.run(MirrorObjectManager.java:1)

      at org.springframework.transaction.aspectj.AbstractTransactionAspect.ajc$around$org_springframework_transaction_aspectj_AbstractTransactionAspect$1$2a73e96cproceed(AbstractTransactionAspect.aj:67)

      at org.springframework.transaction.aspectj.AbstractTransactionAspect$AbstractTransactionAspect$1.proceedWithInvocation(AbstractTransactionAspect.aj:73)

      at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.invokeWithinTransaction(TransactionAspectSupport.java:388)

      at org.springframework.transaction.aspectj.AbstractTransactionAspect.ajc$around$org_springframework_transaction_aspectj_AbstractTransactionAspect$1$2a73e96c(AbstractTransactionAspect.aj:71)

      at com.checkpoint.management.dleserver.coresvc.internal.mirror.MirrorObjectManager.createMirrorMessage_aroundBody18(MirrorObjectManager.java:416)

      at com.checkpoint.management.dleserver.coresvc.internal.mirror.MirrorObjectManager$AjcClosure19.run(MirrorObjectManager.java:1)

      at org.aspectj.runtime.reflect.JoinPointImpl.proceed(JoinPointImpl.java:149)

 

cpm=# select objid, name, domainid, tsdata, tsfacet from dleobjectderef_data where objid = '60b15fda-5bb0-4f60-969e-9207efeb6d32';

                objid                 |      name       |               domainid               |          tsdata           |                                              tsfacet

--------------------------------------+-----------------+--------------------------------------+---------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 60b15fda-5bb0-4f60-969e-9207efeb6d32 | grc_interpreter | e644a839-573c-4c56-a9c2-44ecdf5acfff | 'grc':1A 'interpreter':2A | 'domainid.e644a839-573c-4c56-a9c2-44ecdf5acfff' 'systemTags.ea7f217a-3224-4bfc-9a21-8ab70e4478c3'

(1 row)

 

17/01/26 15:22:00,790  INFO internal.mirror.MirrorObjectManager [taskExecutor-477]: Updated mirror object id com.checkpoint.objects.threat_prevention.SimplifiedThreatPolicyMirror CheckPointObject{metaInfo=com.checkpoint.management.dlecommon.ngm_api.MetaInfoForTopLevel@12dc4f8d, featuresPreset=null, features=[], tags=[], systemTags=[], actions=[], dynamicFeatures=null} {name='FirewallPolicyA', objId='18399135-1cc0-42ff-a305-9281c2815c46', domain='NULL'}, mirrorMessage bc38043a-acbd-4233-915c-c0a90a60275e

17/01/26 15:22:00,791  INFO coresvc.internal.NewUpgradeManagerImpl [taskExecutor-477]: Looking for appContext for domain 9a75368d-5d72-4fbc-9102-98ff2c44d34e

17/01/26 15:22:00,795 ERROR internal.operation.OperationSvcImpl [upgradeTaskExecutor-3]: caught exception "HV000028: Unexpected exception during isValid call." from class javax.validation.ValidationException javax.validation.ValidationException: HV000028: Unexpected exception during isValid call.

      at org.hibernate.validator.internal.engine.constraintvalidation.ConstraintTree.validateSingleConstraint(ConstraintTree.java:286)

      at org.hibernate.validator.internal.engine.constraintvalidation.ConstraintTree.validateConstraints(ConstraintTree.java:133)

      at org.hibernate.validator.internal.engine.constraintvalidation.ConstraintTree.validateConstraints(ConstraintTree.java:91)

      at org.hibernate.validator.internal.metadata.core.MetaConstraint.validateConstraint(MetaConstraint.java:84)

      at org.hibernate.validator.internal.engine.ValidatorImpl.validateConstraint(ValidatorImpl.java:525)

      at org.hibernate.validator.internal.engine.ValidatorImpl.validateConstraintsForNonDefaultGroup(ValidatorImpl.java:489)

 

 

0 Kudos
7 Replies
the_rock
MVP Diamond
MVP Diamond

Did verification suceed?

Best,
Andy
0 Kudos
reybanger
Contributor

Without this, it would not work, so yes, it did succeed 

0 Kudos
the_rock
MVP Diamond
MVP Diamond

Did TAC suggest anything yet?

Best,
Andy
0 Kudos
reybanger
Contributor

It's with R&D now. Seems like a bigger issue. 

0 Kudos
the_rock
MVP Diamond
MVP Diamond

Please keep us posted. But yes, I do agree, if its with R&D, seems like a bigger problem.

Best,
Andy
0 Kudos
the_rock
MVP Diamond
MVP Diamond

Hey,

Any luck with this?

Best,
Andy
0 Kudos
reybanger
Contributor

Still waiting for a solution from RD. 

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.