- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Access Control and Threat Prevention Best Practices
5 November @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Firewall Uptime, Reimagined
How AIOps Simplifies Operations and Prevents Outages
HTTPS Inspection
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Spark Management Portal and More!
Hi CheckMates!
Strange things keep happening. We have a 6200Plus 80.40 take 156 cluster installation.
To be sure of new configurations, we create snapshots of configurations before any major changes.
Today, during the creation of the snapshot, the primary member of the Cluster rebooted. I tried again and apparently as soon as the snapshot completion status is 21% the machine reboots.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Gianni.
Hi Mates,
in the end node 01 is definitely dead. We proceeded to do RMA and yesterday we rebuilt the configuration to rebuild the cluster. Thanks everyone for the support.
Better times will come
Gianni.
is gateway under heavy load during snapshot creation?
No, I would say completely normal operation. I am trying to read DMESG or messages but I don't find anything interesting
If you cant see any process consuming high cpu/memory during this process, might be worth TAC case.
I tried to create the snapshot on the inactive node of the cluster and had no problems. At this point I reversed the roles and tried to create the snaphost again without success. Use of resources when creating the snapshot before auto-rebooting was like 16% for xfsdump process.
Sounds like faulty hw
Logically, I agree with you 100%. I would still confirm with TAC though if I were you.
Just asked partern for openinf relative SR. Do not look foward for TAC support (hope not for RMA).
Well, dont know what to say mate : - ). We are all in the same boat when it comes to opening TAC case, sometimes gotta be done.
Hi Mates 🙂
I was told to reinstall the gateway from scratch or first try to install the latest upgrade then reinstall in case the upgrade does not solve. Hughs needed 🙂
Are you able to upgrade it to latest R81.10 jumbo 66? I recommend that version to all customers, seems very stable.
Hi Mates,
in the end node 01 is definitely dead. We proceeded to do RMA and yesterday we rebuilt the configuration to rebuild the cluster. Thanks everyone for the support.
Better times will come
Gianni.
Sucks you had to do it, but at least its good it all works now.
Andy
It was not so simple to restore; i was able to restore backup only after installing all JHF and setting not to check versions of JHF bydbset backup:override_hfs t but, ok, it's quite working. See my post https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Remote-Access-VPN/Mobile-Access-Portal-Strangeness-after-restore...
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 19 | |
| 16 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 |
Thu 30 Oct 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
Cloud Security Under Siege: Critical Insights from the 2025 Security Landscape - EMEAThu 30 Oct 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2025 #15: Become a Threat Exposure Management Power User!Thu 30 Oct 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Cloud Security Under Siege: Critical Insights from the 2025 Security Landscape - AMERThu 30 Oct 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
Cloud Security Under Siege: Critical Insights from the 2025 Security Landscape - EMEAThu 30 Oct 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2025 #15: Become a Threat Exposure Management Power User!Thu 30 Oct 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Cloud Security Under Siege: Critical Insights from the 2025 Security Landscape - AMERWed 05 Nov 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EST)
TechTalk: Access Control and Threat Prevention Best PracticesAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY