- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hi:
We're looking for redundancy at Sync level and, therefore, to add a second Sync interface in our VSX enviroment (R81.10 JHF169). I was reading the VSX Admin Guide but didn't find the proccess to do it. Does someone know how to achieve it?
Thanks
Regards
You will need to create a bond (which requires at least one unused interface), then you will need to change sync to use the bond instead of whatever interface it's using now. Once you have the bond and the members are using it for sync, you can add the old interface you used for sync to the bond. Redundancy is then handled by the bond configuration, which is local to each member.
Note that sync traffic is always from the same port, IP, and MAC to the same port, IP, and MAC. LACP will always hash it to the same link, regardless of configuration. Round-robin transmit link selection is generally best for this, as it ensures all of the available sync links are actually tested.
In general the process to change the Sync interface is outlined by sk36977.
As Bob has recommended definitely a Bond is the way to go.
You will need to create a bond (which requires at least one unused interface), then you will need to change sync to use the bond instead of whatever interface it's using now. Once you have the bond and the members are using it for sync, you can add the old interface you used for sync to the bond. Redundancy is then handled by the bond configuration, which is local to each member.
Note that sync traffic is always from the same port, IP, and MAC to the same port, IP, and MAC. LACP will always hash it to the same link, regardless of configuration. Round-robin transmit link selection is generally best for this, as it ensures all of the available sync links are actually tested.
In general the process to change the Sync interface is outlined by sk36977.
As Bob has recommended definitely a Bond is the way to go.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 19 | |
| 17 | |
| 14 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 |
Tue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY