- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Security Gateways
- :
- Re: Deployement Agent is not getting installed
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Deployement Agent is not getting installed
Hi,
I am trying to install the deployment agent via cli, I have uploaded deployment agent in \home\admin.
whenever i am trying to install the agent via command installer agent install (whole path name) (package name).
But it is giving me error that this is not DA agent, I tried to check show installer package.
I am getting error: Connection error, Package list might be incomplete.
- Labels:
-
Gaia
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
There are three different installer subcommands for applying a package to a box:
- installer install - Used only for jumbos and hotfixes.
- installer clean-install - Used for mostly-clean installation of major versions. Some configuration is retained, but most is not.
- installer upgrade - Used to upgrade from one major version to another while retaining configuration.
As long as 'installer verify <package name>' says you're good to upgrade, you just need to run 'installer upgrade <package name>'.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you download the DA from here https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk92449 ?
Can you please share the exact error you received?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is newly installed VM management server with trial licenses
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Can you please try with .tgz as listed in the SK:
installer agent install <full path>/DeploymentAgent_<build>.tgz
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, I tried with .tgz but still the same error
PFA screenshot for you reference.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I think your \ is wrong, see below, works fine.
Andy
fwpm1> installer agent install
fwpm1> installer agent install
CLINFR0349 Incomplete command.
fwpm1> installer agent install /var/log/De
fwpm1> installer agent install /var/log/DeploymentAgent_000002325_1.tgz
INFO Installing Deployment Agent package - /var/log/DeploymentAgent_000002325_1.tgz ...
INFO After the installation is complete, the Deployment Agent restarts and the CLISH session is terminated
Interactive mode is enabled. Press CTRL + C to exit (This will not stop the operation)
INFO Installation succeeded. Leaving CLISH
[Expert@fwpm1:0]#
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @the_rock ,
Thanks, deployment agent is successfully installed. I was using wrong method.
Now i am trying to upgradation of R80.40 to R81.10 via cli,
My package is imported, validated also after validation its showing me in result that package is avilable for clean install & upgrade.
My requirement is upgrade but in default installation it is installing with clean install where my exisiting configuration is lost.
What should i have to do if i want to upgrade with existing configuration via cli.
Please help me at earliest possible,
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
First of all, why are you doing this via cli? Supported and recommended method is via web ui. I would say contact TAC if you get stuck, have not done it via cli in who knows how long.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @the_rock ,
Thanks for your quick response.
I spoke with TAC team, they said me that recommended method is via cli, sometimes you will be face issue when you will upgrade via GUI, that's the reason I am trying to update via cli
Because when I am trying to upgrade via GUI, it's asking me option of clean install or upgrade but in cli I am not getting option.
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I hate to disagree, but whoever in TAC you spoke with, they are 100% wrong. Recommended method is actually via web UI and if you right click on the package and hit verify upgrade, it would tell you if its compatible.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You can show them this, its an official CP document
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
All methods are supported and should work perfectly. I do not think it is correct for TAC to state that CLI is the recommended option.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I agree with you @Tal_Paz-Fridman , BUT, there is a difference between supported and recommended methods. All methods of upgrade are supported, but I am positive web UI is recommended way. Btw, I hope you are safe over there and I pray for peace. Sorry I keep repeating this statement, but I have to, because I lived in war literally half of my life, so it hits home for me, as they say.
I been all over middle east and Israel and you meet amazing people no matter where you go. I know that humanity will win at the end, because all people anywhere on this planet want is to leave in peace and respect.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Message me offline, we can do remote, Im just doing some lab stuff anyway, so can help you if you are stuck.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @the_rock ,
Thanks for your kind support, Yes my issue is resolved yesterday.
I just want to know if i want to upgrade version R80.40 to R81.10, so its mandatory to upgrade to latest tool package also?
Thanks in advance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Great! NOT mandatory, but you should always do it.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @the_rock ,
its need to install before upgradation right?
Just like you want to say that when i am in R80.40 at that time i need to install correct?
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
YES AND YES
Sorry, not yelling, just saying yes 🤣
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
There are three different installer subcommands for applying a package to a box:
- installer install - Used only for jumbos and hotfixes.
- installer clean-install - Used for mostly-clean installation of major versions. Some configuration is retained, but most is not.
- installer upgrade - Used to upgrade from one major version to another while retaining configuration.
As long as 'installer verify <package name>' says you're good to upgrade, you just need to run 'installer upgrade <package name>'.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You got it exactly right @Bob_Zimmerman 👍
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
By the way, what I also did once I moved the file to /var/log is below:
cd /var/log
chmod 777 DeploymentAgent_000002325_1.tgz
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I agree with what @Tal_Paz-Fridman said. As soon as I saw your error, it came to mind that possiblt package ext might be wrong.
Andy
