- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Check Point Jump-Start Online Training
Now Available on CheckMates for Beginners!
Why do Hackers Love IoT Devices so Much?
Join our TechTalk on Aug 17, at 5PM CET | 11AM EST
Welcome to Maestro Masters!
Talk to Masters, Engage with Masters, Be a Maestro Master!
ZTNA Buyer’s Guide
Zero Trust essentials for your most valuable assets
The SMB Cyber Master
Boost your knowledge on Quantum Spark SMB gateways!
As YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY
Upgrade to our latest GA Jumbo
CheckFlix!
All Videos In One Space
Are the SMB devices ever going to get radius 2.0 support? I spent a good deal of time trying to figure out why I was getting auth denied only to find the root cause was 16 character limit (I'm using google 2FA so really its 10 + 6 for pass code) as SMB only supports v1.0 radius.
Thanks for the new image Chris, I just logged in with a 20 character password and radius worked fine!
I'm not sure if I should be sharing the build info, but if its ok I'll let Chris share details.
Hi John I've asked internally if this is planned for the upcoming R81.x alignment.
Currently it requires RFEs per sk13740.
Cool deal. I'm sure adding in this feature could positively effect 10s of people, which should be enough to justify the programing, QA and support costs associated with possibly breaking something in the process.
Thanks for asking!
Hi John,
Which version/build are you currently testing with?
R80.20.35 (992002613) on 1500
Thanks will be in touch.
Thanks for the new image Chris, I just logged in with a 20 character password and radius worked fine!
I'm not sure if I should be sharing the build info, but if its ok I'll let Chris share details.
Definitely not supported as of yet...when it will be, no clue. Maybe you can double check with your local SE.
The R81 release cannot come quick enough. Apart from RADIUS 2.0 the lack of NTLM v2 (rendering AD query unusable) as well as Identity Collector support has been a big challenge for us in certain deployments.
Identity Collector support is expected with R81.x with a view of the Microsoft hardening their are few alternatives.
About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY