- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Remote Access VPN
- :
- Re: What types of Remote access on SMB 1550
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
What types of Remote access on SMB 1550
What types of remote access solutions are supported on the new 1550 appliances?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Looks to be fairly basic.
Comes with a 100 Concurrent MOB license but doesn't support MOB so guessing is the Check Point Mobile for Windows Client support that is for as the SK states Basic VPN remote access through mobile application is supported.
Never been a fan of Remote Access on the SMB boxes, tended to use them at Branch and then Central Site with Full Gaia Boxes Remote Access then over the Site to Site VPN to the Branch.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just about the same as in the former, older models:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
No - the SSL Portal requires MAB Blade. Remember good old SNX, long before MAB ? This is used with SMB, see sk87522 How to connect to the office from SMB (600/700) Appliance using SSL VPN? for details.
Further reading about the differences between GAiA and 1550 Embedded GAiA: sk159772 Check Point R80.20 for 1500 Appliances Features and Known Limitations.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
... otherwise this would not be called remote, but internal access ! If CPs SK naming shows difficulties concerning the english language that is certainly not my fault 8) ! I would just follow my suggestions, Mr. Shoemaker 😉 .
