- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Improve Your Security Posture with
Threat Prevention and Policy Insights
Overlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hi CheckMates,
We have a clusterXL with 2 X 1800 appliances, running gaia embedded R81.10.17. This cluster is used for remote access vpn connections.
VPN clients face an issue. When they try to connect, site is not responding error appears. Checking on logs, we can see port 80 is dropped by our clean up rule.
If we create a explicit rule allowing port 80 from client public IP, the connection is successful. So i have two questions: Is it normal remote access vpn clients use port 80? if it is normal, i think it should be accepted by default, rigth?
We have the option "Accept Remote Access control connections" enabled on global properties. Any help is appreciated thanks in advance.
Regards
It's normal for the client to reach out on port 443.
Port 80 should redirect there.
Hi,
Thans for your help. So, in our case, redirection is not working? as vpn clients connections are dropped on port 80.
If you don't allow access on port 80, that redirect won't happen.
Why the client is using port 80 is a separate question.
What client version on what platform(s)?
The happens with many different client versions on windows. In my case i am using endpoint security E89.00 and windows 11. On the other hand, i have a couple dozens different customers with similar scenario, and i can connect to all of them without problems, without allowing port 80 with an explicit rule.
The configuration is the same as on the screenshot, https and all interfaces. To connect the clients use vpn.domain.com or the public IP address, without port. In both cases the same issue.
Regards
This is very interesting...let me finish some Cisco stuff Im doing, will definitely confirm this in the lab later.
Andy
I just tested and worked fine in my lab, mind you, port 80 is allowed, which would make sense, since redirect does happen.
Andy
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 3 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
Wed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasWed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY