This website uses Cookies. Click Accept to agree to our website's cookie use as described in our Privacy Policy. Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
ABOUT CHECKMATES CYBER SECURITY COMMUNITY & FAQ
Create a Post
Help
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

R80.40 Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator - New Ongoing take #126

Are you a member of CheckMates?

×
Sign in with your Check Point UserCenter/PartnerMap account to access more great content and get a chance to win some Apple AirPods! If you don't have an account, create one now for free!
eranzo
Employee
Employee
0 1 1,583
‎2021-10-13 11:11 AM

eranzo_0-1634148656225.png

Hi All,

 

A new Ongoing Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator take for R80.40 (take 126) was released today,  and is available for download. Please refer to sk165456

 

Please note the following:

  •        The new release is mentioned in  sk165456
  •        The new releases will be published via CPUSE as a recommended version once it will be published as GA.
  •        Availability:

o   Available to download the via sk165456

o   Available for download via CPUSE by using package identifier.

o   Can be provided by customer support

 

Content included in this take:

  • List of resolved issue in this take can be found in sk165456

 

Thanks ,

Release Management Group

0 Kudos
1 Comment
Tobias_Moritz
Advisor
‎2021-10-14 08:13 AM

Can anybody provide details for:

PRJ-27192,
PRHF-17768		 Application Control UPDATE: Improved matching of URLs for custom applications.

 

There were some discussions here on CheckMates regarding how to specify matching strings for URLs in custom application objects (including RegEx syntax) to allow only what is wanted and also do not cause performance problems due to challenges for the parser. There are also various SKs available for that.

So I am interested in what was changed here. Do we have to change our object definitions? I guess not, otherwise this would have been flagged as breaking change. But: Are some kind of patterns now usable without big performance impact which were problematic before? If yes, what kind?

Thank you for providing details 🙂

0 Kudos
Labels