- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- General Topics
- :
- Re: error Clear text packet should be encrypted
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
error Clear text packet should be encrypted
Yesterday we upgraded the mgmt from r80.40 to r81.20
and we have two firewalls still on r80.40
the site to site on the firewalls still up but the icmp/snmp traffic generated from same source ip addresses in the tunnel are being dropped with this error message:
@;3243628120;[vs_0];[tid_0];[fw4_0];fw_log_drop_ex: Packet proto=17 x.x.x.x:56134 -> y.y.y.y:161 dropped by vpn_drop_and_log Reason: Clear text packet should be encrypted;
@;3243632857;[vs_0];[tid_0];[fw4_0];fw_log_drop_ex: Packet proto=1 x.x.x.x:52 ->y.y.y.y:0 dropped by vpn_drop_and_log Reason: Clear text packet should be encrypted;
on the mgmt we edited this file: //opt/CPsuite-R81.20/fw1/lib/crypt.def last lines to:
#ifndef NON_VPN_TRAFFIC_RULES
#ifndef IPV6_FLAVOR
#define NON_VPN_TRAFFIC_RULES (dst=y.y.y.y or dst=z.z.z.z)
#else
#define NON_VPN_TRAFFIC_RULES 0
#endif
the problem is still occurring
how to fix this ?
please advice
thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Let me see if I can find some stuff about this, it might be known issue if gateways are still on R80.40
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
K, found it...MAKE SURE to backup the files first, of course
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
No sir, that also did not fix the issue
[Expert@CP-MGMT:0]# cd $FWDIR/conf
[Expert@CP-MGMT:0]# pwd
/opt/CPsuite-R81.20/fw1/conf
[Expert@CP-MGMT:0]# ll | grep user.def
...
-rwxrwx--- 1 admin bin 882 Mar 7 20:44 user.def.FW1
...
-rw-r----- 1 admin bin 732 Nov 16 2022 user.def.R8040CMP
...
[Expert@CP-MGMT:0]#
[Expert@CP-MGMT:0]# cp user.def.FW1 user.def.R8040CMP
[Expert@CP-MGMT:0]#
[Expert@CP-MGMT:0]# ll | grep user.def.FW
-rwxrwx--- 1 admin bin 882 Mar 7 20:44 user.def.FW1
[Expert@CP-MGMT:0]# ll | grep user.def.R
....
-rw-r----- 1 admin bin 882 Mar 8 18:56 user.def.R8040CMP
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you install the policy?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
sure i did 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
K, fair enough. If thats the case, I dont want to tell you to modify anything else with that file, as Im worried we may make it worse and no one wants that on the weekend lol
Anyway...maybe reverse all the changes and lets take a step back here. So, IF its saying clear packet should be encrypted, logically, that insinuates to me that something is missing in the enc. domain possibly...can you check?
Best,
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
thankyou
we'll check with TAC
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi bezeq_int,
So, it's a while ago but any chance you could still share the outcome of your TAC case? Would be great for me but also other people crawling these topics.
