- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
I want to create a global domain policy that blocks communications from specific countries.
I've created a group for them and assigned the policy to different domains.
I want to ensure that the objects in each domain are updated dynamically.
For dynamic objects, it is necessary to add the _global suffix, in order to trigger the reference replacement mechanism.
What about updatable objects?
Are they updated dynamically on each domain as well?
Can I check their content or at least their object number to compare a global domain with a specific domain?
For Dynamic Objects in MDS in R8x, see: https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Management/Dynamic-Global-Objects-no-longer-supported/m-p/7654#M...
But, yes, you're correct.
In both cases, the actual content of the object resides on the gateway itself, not on the management.
For Dynamic Objects in MDS in R8x, see: https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Management/Dynamic-Global-Objects-no-longer-supported/m-p/7654#M...
But, yes, you're correct.
In both cases, the actual content of the object resides on the gateway itself, not on the management.
May sound like a silly question but what is the difference between a dynamic object and domain object? I ask because when creating a dynamic object example "www.abc.com" rather then ".abc.com" it does not work, yet if I do the same thing with a domain object, it does work.
I assume you mean FQDN Domain object. Is so, it is an object that FW resolves into an IP through DNS queries. Dynamic object is a logical container that is filled with IPs from an external source. In your case, if you do not feed an abc.com dynamic object with relevant IPs, it will not be matched to anything in your rulebase, hence the observed behavior.
Best to read the management admin guide for your version for more details.
Great thanks, I did suspect this when I found some CLI commands to add IPs to dynamic objects, are the same performance issues there related to FQDN objects in R81.x?
Dynamic Objects were not SecureXL friendly in pre-R80 versions.
In current versions, they are SecureXL friendly, so there should be no performance impact.
Great! Thanks for the confirmation.
What are the risks of deploying dynamic objects ?
I would say the main things I can think of are:
DNS
Access to the Internet for the appliance to retrieve the databases.
Vendor updating IP addresses and the time it takes for the database to be updated with the new information.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| 19 | |
| 18 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Tue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY