- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Policy Insights and Policy Auditor in Action
19 November @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Access Control and Threat Prevention Best Practices
Watch HereOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
problem with rdp access
hangs on this window for a minute or two and then connects
any ideas what to look for?
happens from every computer on a given vlan to another vlan on the checkpoint gaia appliance
What do you see on a tcpdump between the relevant hosts?
Anything in the logs that might suggest what's going on?
This sounds like a DNS issue of some sort that is unrelated to the firewall.
This Sounds like a
DNS issue or
RDP encryption issue or
RDP authentication (ntlm vs. kerberos) issue.
Anything in in the Windows event logs?
Or old RDP client and new Windows 2012/2016/2019 Server.
Microsoft Troubleshooting RDP Client connection problems:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/186645/troubleshooting-rdp-client-connection-problems
i've narrowed down the issue :
when you try to connect using mstsc, the application tries to contact microsoft's servers. the hang is caused by the firewall trying to process it (i think)
It looks like it is hitting a UserCheck rule of some sort (e.g. the redirect log entries).
You might want to explicitly allow that traffic or create a REJECT (as opposed to drop) rule for it.
thank you
1. the problem is that this ip is a part of a very large pool. cp recognizes it as windows update in the application layer.
2. why reject vs drop? what's the advantage ?
With a drop, the application will receive no response and may wait for the attempted TCP connection to timeout.
With a reject, the firewall sends a TCP Reset, which will hopefully cause the application to quit trying to reconnect.
so, in general (very interesting information), in what cases should i use drop and what cases should i use reject?
In the vast majority of cases, I would use Drop.
Reject is useful in situations similar to what you describe.
thank you
for the moment, i've created a policy letting me access windows update at the application level, and it looks fine. i'll keep track of it
Hi
the problem seems to be persistent. every few days, some new address pops up
i've came across addresses like : map2.hwcdn.net, and like 3.a.download.windowsupdate.com and so on and so forth
how can i make the proper exclution for all those url's in a wildcard form? i don't mind handling each domain, but dealing with each ip is crazy
thank you
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 27 | |
| 23 | |
| 15 | |
| 14 | |
| 12 | |
| 10 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 |
Wed 19 Nov 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EST)
TechTalk: Improve Your Security Posture with Threat Prevention and Policy InsightsThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - AMERThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CST)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - EMEAWed 26 Nov 2025 @ 12:00 PM (COT)
Panama City: Risk Management a la Parrilla: ERM, TEM & Meat LunchWed 19 Nov 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EST)
TechTalk: Improve Your Security Posture with Threat Prevention and Policy InsightsThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - AMERThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CST)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAWed 26 Nov 2025 @ 12:00 PM (COT)
Panama City: Risk Management a la Parrilla: ERM, TEM & Meat LunchAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY