Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Thisara_Dilshan
Explorer

Routing the return Traffic Through the Same incoming interface

Hi Team,

This is my second post on the Check Point community, and I must say I find this platform extremely helpful in resolving many of my concerns.

I’m seeking your expert opinion on a requirement we’re working on: ensuring that return traffic is routed through the same interface it originally arrived on.

As illustrated in the attachment, we need to publish a single web application using two public IP addresses provided by two different ISPs. For example, let’s say we’re publishing the website example.com to the internet. DNS load balancing (round-robin) is being used to distribute requests between the two IP addresses.

Here’s the current scenario:

  1. Traffic coming to x.x.x.x (ISP1) is NATed to z.z.z.z, and since the firewall’s default route points to ISP1, return traffic is successfully routed back via ISP1.

  2. However, traffic arriving at y.y.y.y (ISP2) is also NATed to z.z.z.z, but the return traffic is still sent out via ISP1 due to the default route. As a result, the application doesn’t work properly when accessed via ISP2.

 

Could you please confirm whether this type of return routing (i.e., symmetric routing based on incoming interface) can be achieved using Check Point? If so, i would appreciate your guidance on how to implement it. If not, are there any recommended workarounds?

 

 

0 Kudos
6 Replies
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

If any feature allows for this, it's ISP Redundancy.
However, I suspect what you're looking for is an RFE.

0 Kudos
Thisara_Dilshan
Explorer

Hi @PhoneBoy 

 

Thanks for sharing your input. 

Yes. This is working fine with ISP Redundancy. However, in this specific customer environment, they want to utilize PBR to route some specific traffic as well. In that case, PBR is not working once we enable the ISP redundancy. I guess PBR is not supported with ISP redundancy.  

 

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk167135

0 Kudos
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

Which definitely makes what the customer wants to do an RFE.

0 Kudos
the_rock
Legend
Legend

I see what Phoneboy is saying. ISP redundancy also came to my mind when I saw the diagram.

Andy

0 Kudos
Thisara_Dilshan
Explorer

@the_rock 

 

Thanks for sharing your input. For this specific customer we need both ISP redundancy and PBR working together. Is there any workaround for the PBR concern?

0 Kudos
the_rock
Legend
Legend

According to below, still not supported.

Andy

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk167135

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events