- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026
Inception is On!
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Improve Your Security Posture with
Threat Prevention and Policy Insights
Overlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
I have been sent a report listing various public facing services on our firewalls and whether they are allowing TLS1.0 and TLS1.1.
For the URL that clients use to connect to use the Remote Access vpn it has come back as allowing 1.0 and 1.1
| Risk Vector | Finding Identifier | Last Seen | Grade | Attributed To | Finding Severity |
| SSL Configurations | remoteaccess.mycompany.com:443 | 27/03/2025 | BAD | My Company Inc. | severe |
| Asset Importance | Assets | Details |
| critical | remoteaccess.mycompany.com | Allows insecure protocol: TLSv1.0; Allows insecure protocol: TLSv1.1 |
Presumably the client, when it connects initially, wouldn't be using 1.0 or 1.1. But beyond that I don't know what I can do to get rid of the vulnerability. I am not sure if the vulnerability even is to do with the RemoteAccess service, it is just that it uses the same public IP as the firewalls.
What could I do on the firewall to remove this vulnerability?
The firewalls are VSX running r81
Yes, found here: sk154532: Vulnerability scan detects that the Security Gateway supports TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1 when one ...
See sk178505: Which TLS version do Check Point products use?
and then
That looks promising, many thanks. Looks like it will need a proper review and CAB before implementing but will feedback how I get on.
It is just an advanced Portal configuration option in SmartDashboard menue, see the screenshot @the_rock has posted.
Hi,
Just confirming that this worked, we changed the setting to 1.2 and the vulnerability scan has now succeeded. Thank you
Hey @P_Williams
I believe you can also correct this with settings I attached from global properties.
Andy
Yes, found here: sk154532: Vulnerability scan detects that the Security Gateway supports TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1 when one ...
Sorry, my bad, it asked me to log in to view that sk when I tried yesterday, but I see it now.
Andy
You did post the shortcut 🙃
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 17 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 |
Wed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasWed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY