- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Quantum Spark Management Unleashed!
Introducing Check Point Quantum Spark 2500:
Smarter Security, Faster Connectivity, and Simpler MSP Management!
Check Point Named Leader
2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Hybrid Mesh Firewall
HTTPS Inspection
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
SharePoint CVEs and More!
Today i meet with strange issue. Below is the summery .
1. We have Checkpoint firewall cluster in Azure running R77.30 version.
2. There are lot of application working on that firewall using the Policy and NAT ( External Interface NAT ).
3. Today when i created new NAT , all the traffic stopped working.
NAT --> We have to publish new application to internet. We are using FW public IP to host the application on different ports and using NAT traffic is getting redirected to internal private IP on ( http or https)
Any suggestion to check , as will not get support from Checkpoint - old version at customer site.
Other than moving to the supported version?
Are you able to share more about what and how you configured it?
Eg Auto vs Manual & Static vs Hide.
Without more info any suggestions will be somewhat limited.
We are using Check Point External interface static NAT .
We are using the same to multiple application on different port, all are working fine, but while doing new NAT for new application its creating issue for all the application.
We are crating NAT rule at END .
Are you able to attach a screenshot?
You are correct that you would not get any support from TAC on it, since it is indeed unsupported version. I agree with @Chris_Atkinson , we need more info as far as whats exactly configured, so we can help you more.
We're going to need a LOT more information about what the current configuration is, what precise changes you made, and what was observed in the gateway AFTER the change was made with respect to the traffic.
What was seen in the logs, fw ctl zdebug, etc.
That said, R77.30 has been End of Support for a while now and your efforts would probably be better spent getting the customer on a more recent version that is supported.
Thanks PhoneBoy, We are planning to upgrade.
We are doing interface NAT , it seems be due to some bug in R77.30
02656968 | Security Gateway | In rare scenarios, when working with Dynamic Objects, NAT rules are not applied anymore after policy installation or update of software blades signatures. This causes traffic outage for all connections that should undergo NAT. |
Resolved almost 5-years ago. Is there no Jumbo installed on this system?
Nope , We are on Take216 .
We took the support of that firewall recently and now we are planning to upgrade.
As the firewall in our support we need to create new rules, but while creating new simple NAT rules ( almost duplicate what we have on firewall almost 90), firewall stopped process all traffic ( even for exiting NAT ) .
Is there any limitation on CP firewall external Interface IP NAT policy in Azure ?
I'll ask my questions again more precisely:
Regardless, I suspect the issue will be resolved by upgrading from R77.30 to a supported release.
The issue you mentioned above is resolved in Take 292 (or higher).
The only constraint that comes to mind otherwise would be if you're attempting to NAT using well know ports where those are daemons on the Firewall itself.
More generic concerns would be the volume of ports available for NAT given a single IP is used.
As the guys said, we need way more details. Screenshot, config example, at least something that can help us help you. Without it, we cant really do much, and as you know, TAC will never help you, since its totally unsupported version. @PhoneBoy made excellent point...have you done basic debug, tcpdump, fw monitor?
Hello Team ,
User want to access the device from Jump server provided public IP mapped to device Management IP private .Could you please help us how to configure NAT which NAT will be better choice hide nat/Auto Nat/Manual NAT .Checkpoint device version is R77.30 .Appreciate your prompt response
R77.30 is out of support for 15 years now. For your case, you need static NAT to an available public IP address.
Why post this here ? This is a very old post and has not much to do with the original issue !
Think of it as port forwarding...say your friend wanted to access your home PC from their place. You would need to add an entry in your home router to forward that traffic, and dst would be whatever internal IP your pc is, so say for rdp port would be 3389
Lets take same example here...lets pretend that somewhere from the Internet, someone has to reach your internal server on port 789
rule would be like this for nat:
original packet:src any, port 789, dst say your external IP
dst packet: src any, port 789, dst - your internal server
Makes sense?
And yes, R77.30 has been unsupported for ages now,please install at least R81, as even R80.40 will be unsupported next month 🙂
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
User | Count |
---|---|
17 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
Wed 10 Sep 2025 @ 11:00 AM (CEST)
Effortless Web Application & API Security with AI-Powered WAF, an intro to CloudGuard WAFWed 10 Sep 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Quantum Spark Management Unleashed: Hands-On TechTalk for MSPs Managing SMB NetworksFri 12 Sep 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 38: Harmony Email & CollaborationWed 10 Sep 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Quantum Spark Management Unleashed: Hands-On TechTalk for MSPs Managing SMB NetworksFri 12 Sep 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 38: Harmony Email & CollaborationAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY