- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Firewall Uptime, Reimagined
How AIOps Simplifies Operations and Prevents Outages
Introduction to Lakera:
Securing the AI Frontier!
Check Point Named Leader
2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Hybrid Mesh Firewall
HTTPS Inspection
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
SharePoint CVEs and More!
Hey guys,
I was wondering if someone might be able to confirm this for me, since I did not want to open TAC case for it as of yet, figured someone here would know for sure. When adding anything that comes up when searching for office 365 in updatable objects in smart dashboard, link that shows up as reference is below:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office365/enterprise/office-365-ip-web-service
Im trying to confirm if above link would cover EVERYTHING listed in below link:
Thats it : - ). My logical assumption is that it does cover it, but want to be 100% sure.
Cheers,
Andy
Yes it does. We have not had any issues accessing O365 after updatable objects were introduced and we could skip scripting it ourselves
Yes it does. We have not had any issues accessing O365 after updatable objects were introduced and we could skip scripting it ourselves
Tx a lot!!
Thanks lots @Kaspars_Zibarts . One more question I have...did you have to make any nat rules modifications? Im thinking not since all those ranges are external, but they dont need to translate to any internal IP?
No nothing special with using updatable objects. But we do use multiple NAT IPs for O365. From memory, o365/ms did not like too many users behind the same single IP. I might be lying now, but I think it was 2000 per IP
Thanks @Kaspars_Zibarts ! This was what customer indicated to me...now the thing is users are everywhere behind the firewall, office 365 online communicate with the users directly not the exchange server. So, in that case, not sure how NAT would be configured or if its even needed.
O365 connections always originate from inside/client. Never from O365 to client
Ok, so Im little confused...so can you give me example of what nat looks like on your end if you dont mind?
Andy
@Kaspars_Zibarts Or, I assume you are referring to source NAT here and NOT destination NAT?
Correct.
@Kaspars_Zibarts thanks! Well, they have option to hide internal networks behind fw checked on cluster properties, so I guess thats good enough? No need to change any inbound nat?
That's correct. There's no need for any inbound NAT. As for outbound - as long as you have you need to make sure that you are not NATing too many users behind one IP:
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
User | Count |
---|---|
26 | |
16 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
Tue 07 Oct 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
Cloud Architect Series: AI-Powered API Security with CloudGuard WAFThu 09 Oct 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live BeLux: Discover How to Stop Data Leaks in GenAI Tools: Live Demo You Can’t Miss!Thu 09 Oct 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live BeLux: Discover How to Stop Data Leaks in GenAI Tools: Live Demo You Can’t Miss!Wed 22 Oct 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Firewall Uptime, Reimagined: How AIOps Simplifies Operations and Prevents OutagesAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY