- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Announcing Quantum R82.10!
Learn MoreOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hello All,
I've recently used the SmartMove to move rules from ASA to CP.
I saw that it puts rules automatically with inline layers.
Is that a way to do same, like group automatically the rules for an existing Check Point policy base (R80.40)?
Thanks a lot!
For existing Check Point policies, not aware of a tool.
We also have not published any guidelines for converting.
If you still have a legacy App Control layer, it’s easy enough to make that an inline layer either by copy paste or converting the ordered layer to an inline one.
hey,
To make sure I understood this correctly "Is that a way to do same, like group automatically the rules for an existing Check Point policy base (R80.40)? " - you mean you want to move existing ordered layers (R80.40 - it doesn't matter) to in-line layer format in an automated way ?
As we moved from ordered to in-line layer a bit more than a year ago, I can tell you that we did that exercise manually, going over each rule-line from ordered layer policy. (we had from 40 lines to 700 lines in our old rulebase)
By doing that we cleared the "debris" 😁 and checked once again what is allowed and what is not allowed, and other stuff like that.
Doing this exercise once every few years, is a good thing in my opinion.
Ty,
Yes exactly, I would like to move ordered layers to be inlines.
The automatic part would be more like a guideline, then we would overseer the outcome of course.
Honestly, just going through them would be the best recommended way from my side, as that is what we did before.
There are several recommendation out there that you can follow, on how to sketch your in-line layer policies.
(I can search them once again and point them to you)
Ty,
I did this for customers few times with smart move and I can tell you that its so much better when you have inline layers. Its more secure, traffic gets handled much faster. Here is a good example...say, for argument sake, you have 1000 rules in your rulebase and no layers at all, inline or ordered. Well, policy will have to be checked until needed rule is hit, but with layers, if it does not hit whats called "parent rule", then it wont bother checking "child rules" inside that inline layer, will just move to next inline layer and so on, until it hits the right one and if nothing matches, then will hit implicit clean up rule, so traffic handling works way better that way.
For existing Check Point policies, not aware of a tool.
We also have not published any guidelines for converting.
If you still have a legacy App Control layer, it’s easy enough to make that an inline layer either by copy paste or converting the ordered layer to an inline one.
Thanks a lot, that's why I have not found anything!
I've thought a way, but I have some questions about it too, will post it as a different after some digging.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 15 | |
| 11 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 |
Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY