- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Maestro Masters
- :
- Found inconsistency of SXL instances between SGMs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Found inconsistency of SXL instances between SGMs
Hi guys!
It looks like asg perf has found some inconsistencies in SLX instances. Here's the output:
Performance Summary
+--------------------------------------------+---------------+
|Name |Value |
+--------------------------------------------+---------------+
|Throughput |4.4 G |
|Packet rate |603.3 K |
|Connection rate |9.7 K |
|Concurrent connections |825.5 K |
|Load average |8% |
|Acceleration load (avg/min/max) |11%/10%/15% |
|Instances load (avg/min/max) |9%/3%/16% |
|Memory usage |17% |
+--------------------------------------------+---------------+
* Instances / Acceleration Cores: 44 / 16 (!)
* ATTENTION: Found inconsistency of SXL instances between SGMs
* Activated SWB: FW
Per SGW Distribution Summary
+-----+----------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-------+
|SGW |Throughput|Packet |Conn. |Concurrent |Accel. |Instances |Mem. |
|ID | |rate |rate |Conn. |Cores |Cores |usage %|
| | | | | |usage % |usage % | |
+-----+----------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-------+
|1_01 |1.8 G |277.1 K |4.9 K |364.3 K |11/10/15 |9/4/18 |16 |
|1_02 |2.6 G |326.2 K |4.8 K |461.2 K |12/11/15 |9/3/15 |18 |
+-----+----------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-------+
|Total|4.4 G |603.3 K |9.7 K |825.5 K |11/10/15 |9/3/16 |17 |
+-----+----------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-------+
* Core usage shows avg, min, or max, as sampled during last 10 seconds
We made sure that fwaffinity.conf file has "i default auto" on both SGMs (nobody has ever meddled with that setting anyway).
Where does it find those 'inconsistencies' in that setup?
Cheers!
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If dynamic balancing is enabled (default in R81.20+) then this is expected behaviour.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If dynamic balancing is enabled (default in R81.20+) then this is expected behaviour.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
So it finds discrepancies between SXL instances because the core affinities are dynamically changed depending on the characteristics of the traffic. Do I get this correctly?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, that's correct.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
starting from the JHF98, this information disappeared from the output:
The information about cores in the “asg perf” output is only get from the local SGM. Accordingly, warnings about mismatches with other SGMs simply cannot occur
