Hi @gnovokmet,
[vs_0][ppak_0] bond1.129:iq[44]: 10.28.129.1 -> 10.30.100.222 (TCP) len=60 id=46372
TCP: 52160 -> 80 .S.... seq=33b5c784 ack=00000000
>>> Packet arrives at the Performance Pack - OK
[vs_0][fw_0] bond1.129:iq[44]: 10.28.129.1 -> 10.30.100.222 (TCP) len=60 id=46372
TCP: 52160 -> 80 .S.... seq=33b5c784 ack=00000000
>>> Packet is forwarded to the CoreXL instance via dynamic dispatcher - OK
[vs_0][ppak_0] bond1.129:iq[44]: 10.28.129.1 -> 10.30.100.222 (TCP) len=60 id=46372
TCP: 52160 -> 80 .S.... seq=33b5c784 ack=00000000
>>> Now the packet is probably reinjected.
>>> Is new since R80.20 (more read here
(Update R80.20+ Security Gateway Architecture (Logical Packet Flow)).
>>> But could also be a second "SYN" package.
>>> Interesting is that there is no "I" package.
>>> Could be due to the "NAT" that the filter no longer takes effect.
[vs_0][fw_0] bond0:Iq[44]: 10.30.100.222 -> 10.28.129.1 (TCP) len=64 id=16362
TCP: 80 -> 52160 .S..A. seq=825ff256 ack=33b5c785
>>> Now comes a response package without a small "i".
>>> This indicates to me that a "NAT" is taking place here.
[vs_0][fw_0] bond1.129:oq[44]: 10.30.100.222 -> 10.28.129.1 (TCP) len=64 id=16362
TCP: 80 -> 52160 .S..A. seq=825ff256 ack=33b5c785
[vs_0][fw_0] bond1.129:Oq[44]: 10.30.100.222 -> 10.28.129.1 (TCP) len=64 id=16362
TCP: 80 -> 52160 .S..A. seq=825ff256 ack=33b5c785
>>> Now the packet SYN/ACK is delivered on the outgoing interface by lowercase "o" and uppercase "O" inspection point.
-------------------------------------------
It looks like to me, that the scanned addresses are send per NAT to an internal system that actually responds.
Please check your NAT rules!
Could also possibly be the following problem:
- Global Properties option that allows admins to choose between "Client side NAT" and "Server side NAT"
- IP pool NAT
➜ CCSM Elite, CCME, CCTE ➜ www.checkpoint.tips