- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Improve Your Security Posture with
Threat Prevention and Policy Insights
Overlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hello guys,
First of all, I'm new with VoIP configuration and now encountering VoIP traffic issue while the call flow traverses the Check Point Gateway
I will briefly explain an issue.
1. When Phone device ( 192.168.10.204 ) that behind firewall calls to Phone device that's the opposite side of firewall ( 10.105.62.102 ). RTP message is working fine, both sides can hear each other
2. But If Phone devices from the opposite side call back to 172.19.0.204 ( translation to 192.168.10.204 ),
RTP message is not working properly, only one side can hear voice but another cannot.
In this point, Phone A could hear, but Phone B could not.
Please see diagram below to refer
Does anyone here ever encounter issue like this before?
Really appreciate every comments
Regards,
Sarm
Can you show us your NAT-rule for the connection. You have to translate both directions. Maybee this is a NAT problem. Did you see the NAT working for both directions?
We had an identic issue and used at first https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solut... to check the right rule set.
Based on how your VOIP Architecture is build you have to choose the right ruleset.
Then most stuff worked but for example more then one call at the same time (to/from external) wasn't possible. We haven't found any Log/Drop.
However our final solution was to disable all SIP IPS Rules for the VOIP Area.
KR
David
I describe exactly this issue in my article:
VoIP Issue and SMB Appliance (600/1000/1200/1400)

Hi,
We've had similiar problem but with H323 and no NAT in our case - "Hide internal networks behind gateway's IP" is checked and we have no NAT rules for VOIP traffic. Source and destination wasn't nated but payload was still nated. SK98354 in our case helped.
Depending on the version You are using look at this SK143713
Regards
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 36 | |
| 18 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 |
Wed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasWed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY