- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
AI Security Masters
Implementing the AI Security Trifecta
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
Hi Checkpoint Gurus
I'm trying to set up a site-to-site VPN with a third-party GW (Router). In the new R82, it looks like there is a feature called "Enhanced link selection."
In my GW object, I've defined the External interface as Enhanced Link Selection. But realistically, we don't know how third-party devices are configured. All we do is exchange the security parameters with the given IP address and accept the interesting traffic.
The problem is that I cannot set up my VPN community in Enhanced mode without defining an Enhanced link selection on the third-party object. This doesn't make sense.
The error message says, "The VPN Community is configured to use "Enhanced Link Selection. "At least one VPN peer does not have configured interfaces. You must configure Enhanced Link Selection Interfaces in each VPN peer object."
Please refer to the attached pictures.
We cannot define interface details on third-party objects, and it's not practical to ask our vendors for this information.
Your help is much appreciated!!!
Please see attached.
Andy
@TINTIN8 Hopefully screenshots I sent are good enough, but if not, let me know.
Andy
I did this in my R82 lab, will send you some screenshots tomorrow. Error is telling you that peer link selection is incorrect, thats why.
Andy
Thanks the_rock!!!
Of course @TINTIN8
Thank you soooo much!!! it worked!!!
Glad we can help.
Andy
For interoperable objects, the interface name doesn't have to match what the remote end actually uses.
You can use something generic like eth0.
The important thing is that interfaces are defined with the correct IP addresses.
@TINTIN8 Hopefully screenshots I sent are good enough, but if not, let me know.
Andy
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 25 | |
| 18 | |
| 16 | |
| 13 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 |
Wed 23 Sep 2026 @ 06:00 PM (EDT)
Santo Domingo: Workspace Security and SASE Live: Protección Total del Usuario Email, Endpoint y SASEMon 28 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
La nouvelle réalité des attaques DDoS: autonomie, échelle et avenir de la défenseMon 28 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
La nouvelle réalité des attaques DDoS: autonomie, échelle et avenir de la défenseThu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksWed 23 Sep 2026 @ 06:00 PM (EDT)
Santo Domingo: Workspace Security and SASE Live: Protección Total del Usuario Email, Endpoint y SASEAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY