- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- General Topics
- :
- Re: Printernightmare CVE-2021-1675
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Printernightmare CVE-2021-1675
Any IPS protection available for CVE-2021-1675 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675 ?
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The PrintNightmare vulnerabilities (CVE-2021-1675 and CVE-2021-34527) are covered by TE and SBA with the following signatures:
- TE:
- Exploit.Wins.PrintNightmare.A
- SBA:
- HEUR:Trojan-Dropper.Win32.Pegazus.gen
- HEUR:Exploit.Win32.CVE-2021-1675.a
- PDM:Exploit.Win32.Generic
- PDM:Trojan.Win32.Generic
In regards to IPS, at present there is insufficient information to create an IPS protection. We re looking into this and will update once new info is available.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The attack vector is local, according to MS.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That's correct. But this is a problematic vulnerability on most of the Microsoft servers and if they are located in a separated protected LAN there should be a protection.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Let me elaborate. To exploit it, you need to locally execute a file on that server. It is in the endpoint scope, not network.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I think the Print Nightmare nickname is for another bug than cve-2021-1675 and that has not an cve record yet and that is an RCE bug and the only workaround is to disable the print spooler.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
looks like there are exploits out there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU3vQ-B-FPY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Wolfgang,
I always use SNORT signatures/rules in these cases when there are no manufacturer signatures.
Most of the time you can extract some good ASCII signatures from the exploit code. Then you can create a SNORT signature and import it via the SmartConsole. This is not so easy most of the time but works quite well.
I always try to extract signatures from metasploit,... or other tools.
More information on how to import SNORT signatures can be found here:
https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_ThreatPrevention_AdminGuide/Topics...
But as @_Val_ said, in this case the attack vector is local so a Snort signature is useless.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Is there actually a snort signature released for this?
I checked the current IPS database and Checkpoint have not added an signature for this yet, which is not good.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have seen that. POC exploit there is deployed locally on the machine. IPS is not in play
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @_Val_, if this CVE is in endpoint scope, Check Point Harmony Endpoint should be able to detect and protect it, right?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
According to @Pasha_Pal, we're currently evaluating our protection capabilities for this exploit on the Endpoint (and also related CVE-2021-34527).
We'll share more details when available.
In the meantime, it is best to apply the Microsoft patches and disable the print spooler on Domain Controllers and any server not using printing.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Is there any update to this?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The PrintNightmare vulnerabilities (CVE-2021-1675 and CVE-2021-34527) are covered by TE and SBA with the following signatures:
- TE:
- Exploit.Wins.PrintNightmare.A
- SBA:
- HEUR:Trojan-Dropper.Win32.Pegazus.gen
- HEUR:Exploit.Win32.CVE-2021-1675.a
- PDM:Exploit.Win32.Generic
- PDM:Trojan.Win32.Generic
In regards to IPS, at present there is insufficient information to create an IPS protection. We re looking into this and will update once new info is available.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
is there any IPS signature update on 1500 series regarding CVE-2021-34527? I can see this IPS protection on 910 but not in any 1500 fw.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Same signatures should be available on both.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I see, @PhoneBoy beat me to that. In short, theoretically yes, but there is a question of detection, under investigation.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Not releasing an IPS signature is not an option - competitors already did so https://www.fortiguard.com/encyclopedia/ips/50553 🙂
I got asked by 2 large clients today already, and it is just Sunday 9+ in the morning.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Indeed! Trend Micro already released mitigation measures on its network and endpoint IPS solutions as well...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I just got the newsletter: The IPS Pattern has been released
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
From what I can see a signature for CVE-2021-34527 was released today, however I could not see anything for CVE-2021-1675, can you confirm if the news letter indicates anything about 1675? or is this only referencing 34527?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Can you please share here?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
A predefined Threat Hunting query would be cool, something thats checks all servers if the spooler service is running and the system is unpatched.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just check, TH predefined queries were updated with 6 new "Real Word" queries regarding Printnightmare
