Hi,
I think I had this problem...
A few weeks ago I had to exchange about nine clusters and with/to R81.20 JHF96
Appliance types that were replaced:
6x00 -> 9x00
6x00 -> 6900
3x00 -> 6x00
Affected rate:
9000 clusters: affected: 100%
6000 clusters: affected: 0%
...and always/only at the same cluster change/implementation step:
Cluster Node1: Replaced and Running as HA Status: Active (Policy: Access + TP)
Cluster Node2: Replaced and Running as HA Status: Standby (Policy: Access)
so we can say: the cluster is "full" replaced and layer2/3 connected (the accessibility of router gateways and arp tables were checked)... what is still missing is the last policy install, so that the second node also gets the TP policy...
...and only with this "last" policy install I got the core dumps (vmcore_zero64.gz)
impact (varies):
9000-cluster#1: both new-members died at the same time!
9000-cluster#2: "only" the new-active node died (which has already been running as active for 2 hours (differen cluster-node locations))
After the dump(s), both cluster nodes were rebooted one after the other and then the last policy install worked... since then, policy installs (regardless of whether: full / tp only / access only) worked without new dumps.
But now jhf98 is installed everywhere...
I therefore had several core dumps and CP (Case# 6-0004180684) said:
PRJ-59644, PRHF-38332
----------------------
jhf96: ontop fix -> accel_HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_T96_828_MAIN_GA_FULL.tar
jhf98: informed me that the fix would be integrated and it was released immediately
that's why I'm surprised that jhf98 is listed here again....
I reopened my case and wait for an answer whether it is an typo in the SK, or there are further/other problems in this direction.
Best
Michael