- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Announcing Quantum R82.10!
Learn MoreOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
is there any way or command on checkpoint firewall gateway to ignore the DF bit flag and assemble traffic as normal.
thanks
This SK is mostly relevant for VPN.
In Linux, at least according to here, the way you would do this would be something like:
You can try this in expert mode and see if it works.
Replace 192.168.1.0/24 with the subnet that requires DF be cleared.
However, I cannot say if this command will work on Gaia or not.
Even if it does, it probably won't persist across reboots or even certain configuration changes in clish/WebUI.
and this is for regular traffic not for vpn traffic is there a way to ignore that DF bit flag on the firewall with a command ?
Not sure about regular traffic, but this is best I can find.
Andy
https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk39270
This SK is mostly relevant for VPN.
In Linux, at least according to here, the way you would do this would be something like:
You can try this in expert mode and see if it works.
Replace 192.168.1.0/24 with the subnet that requires DF be cleared.
However, I cannot say if this command will work on Gaia or not.
Even if it does, it probably won't persist across reboots or even certain configuration changes in clish/WebUI.
You got it, thats it
from my lab:
[Expert@CP-gw:0]# ip route add 192.50.50.0/24 dev eth1 mtu lock 1500
[Expert@CP-gw:0]#
Best,
Andy
also can you explain to me what that output means and if there is a way to fix it on the firewall
To fix a drop? Not sure, maybe worth TAC case.
Andy
we use VSX so not sure how we can add the lock for a route, as far as I know we shouldnt add routes from cli for VSX and I dont see that as an option in Smartconsole
If it's not an option from SmartConsole (where you have to define routes for a VS with VSX), then it's probably not supported.
A few TAC cases I reviewed suggest this isn't supported as well, but best to check with them to confirm: https://help.checkpoint.com
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| 20 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY