- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Step Into the Future of
AI-Powered Cyber Security
What's New in R82.10?
Register HereWhen the Agents Attack
A Live Look at Agentic Exposure Validation
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
is there any way or command on checkpoint firewall gateway to ignore the DF bit flag and assemble traffic as normal.
thanks
This SK is mostly relevant for VPN.
In Linux, at least according to here, the way you would do this would be something like:
You can try this in expert mode and see if it works.
Replace 192.168.1.0/24 with the subnet that requires DF be cleared.
However, I cannot say if this command will work on Gaia or not.
Even if it does, it probably won't persist across reboots or even certain configuration changes in clish/WebUI.
and this is for regular traffic not for vpn traffic is there a way to ignore that DF bit flag on the firewall with a command ?
Not sure about regular traffic, but this is best I can find.
Andy
https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk39270
This SK is mostly relevant for VPN.
In Linux, at least according to here, the way you would do this would be something like:
You can try this in expert mode and see if it works.
Replace 192.168.1.0/24 with the subnet that requires DF be cleared.
However, I cannot say if this command will work on Gaia or not.
Even if it does, it probably won't persist across reboots or even certain configuration changes in clish/WebUI.
You got it, thats it
from my lab:
[Expert@CP-gw:0]# ip route add 192.50.50.0/24 dev eth1 mtu lock 1500
[Expert@CP-gw:0]#
Best,
Andy
also can you explain to me what that output means and if there is a way to fix it on the firewall
To fix a drop? Not sure, maybe worth TAC case.
Andy
we use VSX so not sure how we can add the lock for a route, as far as I know we shouldnt add routes from cli for VSX and I dont see that as an option in Smartconsole
If it's not an option from SmartConsole (where you have to define routes for a VS with VSX), then it's probably not supported.
A few TAC cases I reviewed suggest this isn't supported as well, but best to check with them to confirm: https://help.checkpoint.com
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 8 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Tue 16 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Internet Access Optimization & Performance TuningThu 18 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point WAF - The Next Generation of AI powered protectionTue 23 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point Cloud Firewall | Securing all of your clouds: Art of the possibleTue 16 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Internet Access Optimization & Performance TuningThu 18 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point WAF - The Next Generation of AI powered protectionTue 23 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point Cloud Firewall | Securing all of your clouds: Art of the possibleThu 25 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E10: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 2/5 - AI Red TeamingAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY