- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What’s New in Agentic Network Orchestration
21 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
AI Security Masters
LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate
When Prompt Injection Fails
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
CheckMates Go:
Fun Ding
There are VA detected on checkpoint smart console as following. Kindly advise how to fix.
as a trail solution i have installed the latest build for smartconsole and the issue is still same
Medium | 205024 | CVE-2024-7264 | libcurl 7.32.0 < 8.9.1 DoS (CVE-2024-7264) | Upgrade Curl to version 8.9.1 or later |
|
Check Point firewalls are not vulnerable to CVE-2024-7264 because the vulnerability affects the libcurl library and Check Point products do not use this library.
Check Point firewalls are not vulnerable to CVE-2024-7264 because the vulnerability affects the libcurl library and Check Point products do not use this library.
is this not correct ?
In Check Point environments, the main reference to libcurl is through the command-line utility curl_cli. ?
is this not correct ?
I think so, yes.
Okay. Can we say that Check Point is not vulnerable to this CVE, or has Check Point not yet released any official information regarding it?
I even had TAC case about it before and they told me exact same thing, which is that CP firewalls are not vulnerable to mentioned CVE.
Oh, would you be able to share a screenshot, please?
This was few months ago, will see if I can find an email about it.
Thats just smart console folder.
Hey Andy,
You might have missed it but OP was not reporting a libcurl vulnerability on the gateway side, it's reported as being in SmartConsole.
-Ruan
I saw that, yes. Anyway, let Chris confirm internally, to be 100% sure.
This was investigated at the time and the vulnerable flow is not in use in our implementation.
Where required requests to upgrade the libcurl version can be made via your SE under the RFE process.
Thats more less what TAC advised as well.
Whilst I dislike any detection based solely on version I have asked internally about this.
Suggest raising a specific TAC case and looping in your SE aswell.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 23 | |
| 12 | |
| 12 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Thu 08 Oct 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Zero Trust Network Access, Step by StepFri 09 Oct 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 49: Maak kennis met Check Point R82.20Tue 13 Oct 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
AI Security Masters: LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate When Prompt Injection FailsThu 08 Oct 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Zero Trust Network Access, Step by StepFri 09 Oct 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 49: Maak kennis met Check Point R82.20Thu 15 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
What If Email Security Ran Your Security Awareness Program?Tue 20 Oct 2026 @ 04:00 PM (CEST)
EMEA: Beyond the Basics: Designing Identity Awareness for Large-Scale EnvironmentsThu 29 Oct 2026 @ 11:00 AM (PDT)
Irvine, CA: Secure the Network, the App, and the Workforce: A Hybrid Mesh & SASE BriefingAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY