- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in Check Point SASE
Wednesday, 9 September @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
AI Security Masters
Implementing the AI Security Trifecta
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
There are VA detected on checkpoint smart console as following. Kindly advise how to fix.
as a trail solution i have installed the latest build for smartconsole and the issue is still same
Medium | 205024 | CVE-2024-7264 | libcurl 7.32.0 < 8.9.1 DoS (CVE-2024-7264) | Upgrade Curl to version 8.9.1 or later |
|
Check Point firewalls are not vulnerable to CVE-2024-7264 because the vulnerability affects the libcurl library and Check Point products do not use this library.
Check Point firewalls are not vulnerable to CVE-2024-7264 because the vulnerability affects the libcurl library and Check Point products do not use this library.
is this not correct ?
In Check Point environments, the main reference to libcurl is through the command-line utility curl_cli. ?
is this not correct ?
I think so, yes.
Okay. Can we say that Check Point is not vulnerable to this CVE, or has Check Point not yet released any official information regarding it?
I even had TAC case about it before and they told me exact same thing, which is that CP firewalls are not vulnerable to mentioned CVE.
Oh, would you be able to share a screenshot, please?
This was few months ago, will see if I can find an email about it.
Thats just smart console folder.
Hey Andy,
You might have missed it but OP was not reporting a libcurl vulnerability on the gateway side, it's reported as being in SmartConsole.
-Ruan
I saw that, yes. Anyway, let Chris confirm internally, to be 100% sure.
This was investigated at the time and the vulnerable flow is not in use in our implementation.
Where required requests to upgrade the libcurl version can be made via your SE under the RFE process.
Thats more less what TAC advised as well.
Whilst I dislike any detection based solely on version I have asked internally about this.
Suggest raising a specific TAC case and looping in your SE aswell.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Tue 15 Sep 2026 @ 12:00 PM (MDT)
Lone Tree, CO: Workspace Security and Exposure ManagementThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall Architectures - AWS, Azure & GCPThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Unified Hybrid Mesh Management across AWS Firewalls, SASE and SD-WANThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall Architectures - AWS, Azure & GCPThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Unified Hybrid Mesh Management across AWS Firewalls, SASE and SD-WANThu 17 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EDT)
Americas Deep Dive: Troubleshooting 101 for Check Point FirewallsTue 15 Sep 2026 @ 12:00 PM (MDT)
Lone Tree, CO: Workspace Security and Exposure ManagementWed 23 Sep 2026 @ 06:00 PM (EDT)
Santo Domingo: Workspace Security and SASE Live: Protección Total del Usuario Email, Endpoint y SASEAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY