- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
The State of Ransomware Q1 2026
Key Trends and Their Impact
Good, Better, Best:
Prioritizing Defenses Against Credential Abuse
AI Security Masters E7:
How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for You
Blueprint Architecture for Securing
The AI Factory & AI Data Center
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Raised these questions with our Check Point team. I got response that Zero Touch really not a good option in our case.
- was created for deploying a large number of GWs and maybe not worth fighting with config issues for a small number of deployments where downtime needs to be minimized.
- No Lab environment to test / no separate Internet available to test
Recommendation is to deploy using the traditional method. Build/configure the GW, swap it, reset SIC, change HW model in Smart Console object, push policy.
Maybe Zero Touch will be improved to help ease the replacement of GWs for situations like we face.
Thanks everyone who responded to this post.
About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY