It was my understanding that you cant make any changes to the VS gateway object of the VSX cluster object otherwise the database between the MGMT and the recovered GW would differ resulting in a provisioning error.
However if a hard change freeze was entered into once the issue with the upgrade/patching/general failure occurred the snapshot would still be viable.
But it seems the general consensus here is that the best thing to do is use vsx_util to remove the old failed member and then add the new one as a new member.
A long time ago we had an issue where someone deleted an existing HA cluster from the manager then re-created the cluster and members with the same name & details as before (But with a new version)
This caused all kinds of issues as there were still references to objects that didn't exist or now had the wrong UID.
When it comes to re-introducing the RMA into the cluster, assuming that the old one was removed first via util, is it best to choose a new name or can the old one be used?
E.g.
Cluster of two VSX members:
VSX1 & VSX2
VSX1 fails replacement is VSX01 to make sure there is no residual conflicting details.
CCSME, CCTE, CCME, CCVS