- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Introduction to Lakera:
Securing the AI Frontier!
Quantum Spark Management Unleashed!
Check Point Named Leader
2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Hybrid Mesh Firewall
HTTPS Inspection
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
SharePoint CVEs and More!
Hello community
I have setup an eve-ng lab (distributed) with r80.40 latest JHF take 102.
During the creation of a VSX VSLS cluster gateway with two members i get the below error.
Tue May 4 10:46:12 EEST 2021: Failed to remove the following drivers from GW machine: fw_2 44678357 0 fw_1 44678357 0 fw_0 44678357 2 simmod_0 18789024 0
Any ideas?
BR,
Kostas
Looks like an issue in the JHF, I am actualy trying a reconfigure right now without an jhf and this does seem to work.
Just to add another reply to this, also JHF Take 94 has this issue, so do not user this JHF as well.
It seems to be an issue with JHF 102 that affect reconfigure of VSX. Please use older Jumbo when installing GWs. Once VSX is set up, you can then upgrade GWs to 102.
I'm upgrading a customer right now from R77.30 to R80.40 and hit this issue on HFA 125 after the initial vsx_util reconfigure failed due to timeout. The process was restarted with the 'continue' option before this error and we've had to rebuild the target gateway (because reset_gw fails to load a line from cpprofile.sh).
My understanding was that hotfixes are intended to fix problems, not introduce them - is this not the case? Slowly chipping away at what was once a quality product...
@cosmos Make a difference between hotfix and jumbo hotfix. While the first one solves one particular problem, later one is like a pack of many hotfixes and it is often so large that it can replace nearly entire system and not only solve problem but also introduce new features. In such case, pure statistically speaking it is no surprise problems happen here and there. Also complexity of the gateway software few years ago and now differs quite a lot. No excuses for CheckPoint in spoiling it here but just be more relaxed about doing such conclusions 😀
I hit the same issue with jumbo 118 a month and change ago, and was given sk173683 and a hotfix. According to the SK, the issue is now solved in jumbo 126.
Confirmed, we've just rolled HFA126 and it resolved the issue. We'd be rolling back if it weren't for someone else running into the problem first (for once).
Thanks Bob!
Hi KostasGR,
In most cases this message means that we have failed to remove Firewall-1 driver due to some process (or more) that currently using the driver.
to understand which process is it, please SSH to the Gateway and run the following command (from Expert mode):
fuser /dev/fw0
This command will output the PIDs of the process that currently using the driver.
you can run "ps aux | grep <the pid you got>" in order to understand which process is it.
Please let me know which process currently using the Firewall so we can assist you.
Hello jafara
Finally i followed the _Val_ solution.
Created first the VSX cluster object and then installed the JHF 102.
BR,
Kostas
Just to make sure, that was a workaround and not a solution. I am glad it worked for you
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
User | Count |
---|---|
15 | |
12 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
Tue 30 Sep 2025 @ 08:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2025 #13: Strategic Cyber Assessments: How to Strengthen Your Security PostureTue 07 Oct 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
Cloud Architect Series: AI-Powered API Security with CloudGuard WAFTue 30 Sep 2025 @ 08:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2025 #13: Strategic Cyber Assessments: How to Strengthen Your Security PostureThu 09 Oct 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live BeLux: Discover How to Stop Data Leaks in GenAI Tools: Live Demo You Can’t Miss!Wed 22 Oct 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Firewall Uptime, Reimagined: How AIOps Simplifies Operations and Prevents OutagesAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY