Dear CheckMates
I have a simple cluster with 5+ External interfaces. This cluster has 5+ s2s VPN communities. Depends on the routing the VPN's interoperable devices are behind different external interfaces. The essence of this, this cluster has more than 5 External interfaces.
The VPNs work fine.
Until today.
I created a s2s VPN as before.
Short description:
A_GW -> my_VPN_GW
B_VPN_peer -> peerGW
B_int -> peer interoperable device
B_enc -> network behind the peer (100.X.X.X/25 - yes it begins with 100)
A_int1 -> default route (this is the default route)
A_int2 -> the VPNpeer is behind this IF (from my_VPN_GW's point of view)
The issue:
The if I initiate for eg. a ping from my_VPN_GW to a host in the B_enc, the traffic leaves on the A_int1, although the B_VPN_peer is behind A_int_2 IF.
If I create a static-route -> the traffic goes where it should.
My question would be, this is a normal behavior if the ENC_DOM is not RFC1918?
Akos
----------------
\m/_(>_<)_\m/