- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hi,
I replaced my Check Point SMB 1550 with a Quantum 3600 and I cannot get the tunnel to Harmony SASE working again.
As far as I can debug it, the packet get encrypted but never leave the firewall.
The VPN is up:
IKE:
Peer 209.35.231.46 , vpn-harmony-sase.ffm SAs:
IKEv2 SA 2cae2ad64b836a8f,93a026f7f36c90f7
IPsec:
Peer 209.35.231.46 , vpn-harmony-sase.ffm SAs:
IKEv2 SA 2cae2ad64b836a8f,93a026f7f36c90f7
INBOUND:
1. 0x2a45d4a5 (i: 2)
OUTBOUND:
1. 0xc5850354 (i: 2)
I see the packets coming in through "fw monitor"
[vs_0][fw_1] pppoe7:i[44]: 10.2.3.2 -> 10.0.1.10 (ICMP) len=84 id=48460
ICMP: type=8 code=0 echo request id=14 seq=139
[vs_0][fw_1] pppoe7:i[44]: 10.2.3.2 -> 10.0.1.10 (ICMP) len=84 id=48945
ICMP: type=8 code=0 echo request id=14 seq=140
[vs_0][fw_1] pppoe7:i[44]: 10.2.3.2 -> 10.0.1.10 (ICMP) len=84 id=49316
ICMP: type=8 code=0 echo request id=14 seq=141
But the packets don't make it to the network: "fw ctl zdebug drop shows" me
@;6607.255;[vs_0];[tid_1];[fw4_1];fw_log_drop_ex: Packet proto=1 10.2.3.2:14 -> 10.0.1.10:0 dropped by vpn_before_offload Reason: failed to get OS route;
@;6608.256;[vs_0];[tid_1];[fw4_1];fw_log_drop_ex: Packet proto=1 10.2.3.2:14 -> 10.0.1.10:0 dropped by vpn_before_offload Reason: failed to get OS route;
This really weird, because the firewall itself can ping the system:
[Expert@fortress-new:0]# ping 10.0.1.10
PING 10.0.1.10 (10.0.1.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.0.1.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.02 ms
The destination network is a bridging interface (br0).
Yours, Martin
Which JHF (Jumbo) is installed on this system and could you please share a simple diagram of the topology?
Installed the latest recommended JHF (89?)
Had to roll back and disconnect the system
It was Take 89. I am rebuilding the system and try it without a bridging interface
Is there one update about this test @Masek , i had the same problem in my LAB enverioment.
Use migrate_server for backup/restore at the moment...
I had the same problem and after changed the Bridge to Physhical interface the problem stop...
But i had this in one LAB enverioment, but i think there is necessary open one Case.
Hi
Did you find a solution to the problem?
Thanks
Nigel
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| 20 | |
| 16 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY