- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Running into "get interfaces with topology" feature problem recently due to route mismatch on cluster members prompted me to write a quick one-liner to compare routes with least possible effort.
It must be noted for example simplicity I used SNMP V1 with public community (which is not advisable in production) so update command snmp part in red accordingly. Also it does require that SNMP port is open on Sync interface (IPs from cphaprob stat output)
For example below I added a dummy 1.1.1.1/32 route to FW1
[Expert@fw1:0]# i=0; cphaprob stat | egrep ^[1,2] | sed 's/(local)//' | awk '{print $2}'| while read line; do let i++; snmpwalk -c public -v 1 $line IP-FORWARD-MIB::inetCidrRouteIfIndex.ipv4 | awk -F\" '{print $2, $4, substr($3,2,2)}' > fw.$i; done; if [ `diff -q fw.1 fw.2 | wc -l` -gt 0 ]; then diff fw.1 fw.2; else echo "Routes OK"; fi
2d1
< 1.1.1.1 10.3.81.67 32
NormaL output would be
[Expert@fwfran1:0]# i=0; cphaprob stat | egrep ^[1,2] | sed 's/(local)//' | awk '{print $2}'| while read line; do let i++; snmpwalk -c public -v 1 $line IP-FORWARD-MIB::inetCidrRouteIfIndex.ipv4 | awk -F\" '{print $2, $4, substr($3,2,2)}' > fw.$i; done; if [ `diff -q fw.1 fw.2 | wc -l` -gt 0 ]; then diff fw.1 fw.2; else echo "Routes OK"; fi
Routes OK
Great solution Kaspar!
It's a useful tip when Cloning Groups are not in use. For cluster enviroments the best is configure a Cloning Group that follows ClusterXL to sync all routing related parameters.
Regards.
absolutely (about cloning groups) but there are some reasons that I'm not able to discuss here why we are not doing it ![]()
Because of egrep ^[1,2] this only works for clusters consisting of two members only.
Because of snmpwalk -c public -v 1 this only works with insecurely configured SNMP.
Because SNMPv3 is standard I recommend to update this one-liner to work with stattest.
@Danny that's why I wrote: It must be noted for example simplicity I used SNMP V1 with public community (which is not advisable in production) 🙂
It was more of an idea that can be replicated in specific environment accordingly. Not everything has be served on silver plate 🙂 it's good to engage our little grey cells as the famous Poirot said 🙂
could be extended for VSX devices using a loop 🙂
Since VSX routes are pushed from Mgmt, they "should" the same on all cluster members, else topology push would fail.
Why not make it a part of a ToolBox collection?
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| 20 | |
| 16 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY