- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Call For Papers
Your Expertise, Our Stage
The Great Exposure Reset
AI Security Masters E4:
Introducing Cyata - Securing the Agenic AI Era
AI Security Masters E3:
AI-Generated Malware
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Hi,
I have an issue with Identity Awareness where I want to configure IDA on a remote gateway.
the topology is
AD --> Corporate GW <---S2S VPN---> Remote GW
IDA is working well in the main office where the AD is and the corporate GW has direct access to the AD. when I try to connect the remote Gateway with the AD I get the following error:
"An error was detected while trying to authenticate against the AD server. It may be a problem of bad configuration or connectivity. Please refer to the troubleshooting guide for more help"
There are no instructions in the IDA manual or SK on how to work in such a configuration.
Does anyone have experience with it or can help troubleshoot?
( I have already contacted support but they aren't very helpful)
Hello Shahar,
We had a similar issue in the past. We noticed LDAP queries did not go trough the tunnel because LDAP traffic is accepted by implied rules and is not encrypted. Used workaround was the procedure in sk26059 and create specific rules for that traffic.
HTH.
Shahar,
maybee it‘s something with the vpn tunnel. Check for connections from your remote gateway to your AD servers. This connections will be initiated with the external IP of your remote gateway. Maybee they are not encrypted or blocked not going the through the tunnel.
Another way... use identity sharing, you can configure your central gateway to share identities with other gateway and your remote gateway should get the identities from the central gateway.
The error is shown if you run the IA wizard for the remote gateway ?
Wolfgang
I would recommend the same - identity sharing. Else I stumbled across this one, sounds like yours:
and this might help too
We use Identity Collector instead of direct connection to AD which seems much soother from our experience 🙂
Hello Shahar,
We had a similar issue in the past. We noticed LDAP queries did not go trough the tunnel because LDAP traffic is accepted by implied rules and is not encrypted. Used workaround was the procedure in sk26059 and create specific rules for that traffic.
HTH.
If the gateways in question are clusters be careful with identity sharing, because we saw identity sharing causing IPSEC replay attacks because of standby members!
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 42 | |
| 25 | |
| 14 | |
| 12 | |
| 8 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 |
Thu 26 Feb 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
AI Security Masters Session 4: Introducing Cyata, Securing the Agentic AI EraTue 03 Mar 2026 @ 04:00 PM (CET)
Maestro Masters EMEA: Introduction to Maestro Hyperscale FirewallsTue 03 Mar 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EST)
Maestro Masters Americas: Introduction to Maestro Hyperscale FirewallsThu 26 Feb 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
AI Security Masters Session 4: Introducing Cyata, Securing the Agentic AI EraTue 03 Mar 2026 @ 04:00 PM (CET)
Maestro Masters EMEA: Introduction to Maestro Hyperscale FirewallsTue 03 Mar 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EST)
Maestro Masters Americas: Introduction to Maestro Hyperscale FirewallsFri 06 Mar 2026 @ 08:00 AM (COT)
Check Point R82 Hands‑On Bootcamp – Comunidad DOJO PanamáAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY