- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Security Gateways
- :
- Re: IPS - HTTP parsing error detected
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
IPS - HTTP parsing error detected
Hello,
I am getting lots of log related to
. Bypassing the request as defined in the Inspection Settings. in IPS Blage log. It is allowing the traffic.
Why its bypassing?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
How do you have geo policy defined? I see Nepal as dst country.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
I have implemented default Optimized cloned rule, all the setting are by default.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That was not my question though. Im wondering how you have geo policy defined, ie are you using updatable objects for it? If not, what version is this and how is legacy geo policy defined? Can you send a screenshot?
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have not configured any geo policy . This is R81.10 version.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have not define any geo policy for now, all coutry name is shown in IPS Blade log with their public IPs.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Above screenshot is from Server to One of the public client, IPS is detecting but is not taking any action and allowing to pass the traffic.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I would see what remediation options it gives and follow that. Usually, inspection settings ALWAYS show as default, UNLESS you really want to protect further against ddos, then you set it to recommended. But again, this is DIFFERENT than optimized profile for IPS.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
No any remediation available for this result as it has not detected any Attack Name, Protection Type, Protection Details. Is there is any way to block or inspect this type of Traffic i case any Event is detected by IPS Blade.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Even after doing this still i am getting same bypass log.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
When i click on Add Exception, it say This protection Doesnot support Exception.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Then it has to be done via inspection settings.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It is bypassing because you have fail-open (the default) set under Manage & Settings...Blades...Threat Prevention...Advanced Settings...General Settings...Fail Mode. This setting still controls the Inspections Settings protections too even though they are part of the Access Control policy now (but didn't used to be).
A situation occurred in which the inspection engine could not properly scan the traffic due to it being out of state, and the default behavior is to let it through. Be careful about setting fail-close here since any traffic that cannot be properly scanned will be denied. There are many, many situations that this can apply to that you may not be expecting, such as a password-protected zip file or a file larger than 150MB being encountered with certain types of inspection set. These will start getting denied if you change this setting.
This setting is covered in the new Check Point Threat Prevention Specialist 2-day course, which was released to ATCs worldwide last month. I recently ran this class for the first time and it got rave reviews for its detailed coverage of IPS (including Inspection Settings), AV, and ABOT.
now available at maxpowerfirewalls.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for this info
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Honestly though, if I were you, I would still open TAC case about it.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello, I have opened TAC. Thank you for your sugessation.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello, Please tell me, did you manage to find a solution to this problem?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Well, thats default setting out of the box, but let @nabil_l confirm how its configured.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello, I have used default setting and not changed Fail Safe mode. Failsafe mode is in bypass.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You can try change it, but not sure it may make a difference, but worth a shot.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I cant try this, as it is production environment and cant take risk.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've seen this before and it started with Chrome browsers enabled that hybridised kyber thing. We enabled some support for it in JHF take 150 but I've not been able to validate if this stops those IPS accepts. What JHF take do you have on that gateway?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
JHF 130
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If you can, it would be good to update to the current recommended JHF and see if that has an effect.