Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Max91
Explorer

Http parsing error

Hello everyone,

In our network environment, we have two firewalls. We attempted to enable SSL inspection on both firewalls, but encountered an error message: “HTTP parsing error.” Notably, both firewalls utilize the same self-signed certificate for outbound inspection. Surprisingly, when we enable HTTPS inspection on only one of the firewalls, everything functions correctly.

Checkpoint firewall is second device in architecture.

the issue is happened on different sites, for example ssllabs.com, apple.com.

some sites work correctly for example udemy.com with inspection enabled.

 

What steps should we take to troubleshoot this issue?

 

Thank you 

0 Kudos
8 Replies
Lesley
Advisor

On the problematic firewall could you check if you can access the internet from this gateway?

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk108202

Check: 

(Part 2 - 3) Best Practices: Internet connection

 

Also I am not sure if 2 Check Point firewalls in the same traffic flow is good with both HTTPS inspection. 

Documentation states: HTTPS Inspection can be enabled on a single Security Gateway at first, and then expanded to additional Security Gateways.

Does not mention if they can be inline, so worth checking. Maybe someone else knows that here. 

-------
If you like this post please give a thumbs up(kudo)! 🙂
0 Kudos
Max91
Explorer

Hey, 

The first fw is not Checkpoint 

If I activate ssl decryption on one of them everything works fine, the problems start when on both of them try to opens tls traffic.

All Firewalls have access to the internet

 

0 Kudos
G_W_Albrecht
Legend
Legend

Sorry, no offense meant - but i just read your issue to my tech support collegues and we had a big laugh together 🤣

It is no wonder that this does not work; and what could be achieved by 2 times SSL inspection ? I would suggest to enable SSL inspection on CP GW only.

CCSE CCTE CCSM SMB Specialist
0 Kudos
Max91
Explorer

Firewall vendors may employ a variety of for detecting threats within encrypted traffic, such as signature-based detection, behavior analysis, machine learning algorithms, heuristics, anomaly detection, or sandboxing. Each technique has its strengths and weaknesses, and vendors may prioritize different approaches based on their research, development, and expertise

This is in addition to the constraints that exist in the organization due to a complex topology

In addition, I don't see any problem with ssl decryption by different vendorim, in other environment there are both firewalls, and proxy's, and products for ssl visabilty, which decrypt tls one after the other without any problem.

0 Kudos
Lesley
Advisor

Double https inspection makes certificate management complex. It is done via MITM and client needs to trust the certificate from gateway. In this case 2. In this case the first firewall will be the client from Check Point point of view. Due that the first gateway sets up the connection on it's own (if inspected). 

client <-> first firewall (MITM HTTPS inspection) <-> Check Point (MITM HTTPS inspection) <-> Web server

The Check Point will be inspecting traffic initiated from the first firewall. The first firewall starts the traffic because it is doing MITM for the client. I am getting headache only thinking about this scenario. 

-------
If you like this post please give a thumbs up(kudo)! 🙂
0 Kudos
G_W_Albrecht
Legend
Legend

Can you give a sketch of the network topology ?

CCSE CCTE CCSM SMB Specialist
0 Kudos
Max91
Explorer

Hey, 

In this scenario, client access to the internet through two firewalls. The first one is a LAN firewall (not Checkpoint) that performs LAN segmentation and forwards traffic to the second firewall, which is a WAN firewall that perfom a accses to internet  (Checkpoint).

Thank you

0 Kudos
Lesley
Advisor

Ah first fw is not Check Point that changes is. It still can be config error. Start with the SK's below:

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk108202

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk65123

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk64521

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk112214

 

-------
If you like this post please give a thumbs up(kudo)! 🙂
0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events