- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
CheckMates Fifth Birthday
Celebrate with Us!
days
hours
minutes
seconds
Join the CHECKMATES Everywhere Competition
Submit your picture to win!
Check Point Proactive support
Free trial available for 90 Days!
As YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY
Upgrade to our latest GA Jumbo
The 2022 MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK®
Evaluations Results Are In!
Now Available: SmartAwareness Security Training
Training Built to Educate and Engage
MITRE ATT&CK
Inside Check Point products!
CheckFlix!
All Videos In One Space
Hi all,
I seem to recall hearing some time ago that there was a performance hit for the more cluster members you added to a cluster. Is this still an issue in R80.30? (or was it ever an issue?!)
I have a cluster of two gateways, and want to add a 3rd cluster member in my DR site, so all the interfaces would be trunked via a 10gb circuit between the main office and the DR site, and the ISP can route the public IP's to the DR site if the primary site went down. Latency over the circuit is very low. Are there any other performance type issues that might trip me up?
Thanks.
I would rather assume that what you remember is mainly valid in LS clustering for the pivot member, as we read in ClusterXLAdvanced TechnicalReference Guide :
In ClusterXL Load Sharing mode, configuring more than 4 members significantly decreases cluster performance due to amount of Delta Sync.
As @PhoneBoy has already said, this is no problem with a HA ClusterXL. We have it with several customers so in use.
Note only the time of the ccp packets. It should be only 100 ms.
Furthermore I would not enable the encryption of ccp packets at R80.30 if you use 3 gateways.
More read here:
About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY