- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Security Gateways
- :
- Re: BGP help
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
BGP help
Hi there
First time BGP setup with checkpoint (r80.40)
I've got a new environment and trying to setup a Cisco VSS with multiple VRFs that terminate to 16000 checkpoint. So multiple internal BGP peers with same AS #, i have received the routes fine from each peer, but i want to share routes from Peer 1 with Peer 2 for my test setup before i reattempt in production. I was able to share the checkpoint connected networks, as well as static routes fine with combination of route redistribution / route map, but not the BGP routes from
Route redistribution allows to pick same FROM/TO AS# and add a filter, thought that might work but no luck.
How is the way to do this? I'm also stuggling on route distribution with WebUI vs route-map on CLI... when is the right scenario to use each?
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
For your enviroment, since all peers are sharing the same AS, I believe you need to enable "as override" and "allowas-in" in your BGP configuration.
Please look the GAIA Advanced Routing to get the commands or to do through WEBUI.
https://dl3.checkpoint.com/paid/69/69d1c6899e768ea0687857ec55d723d9/CP_R80.40_Gaia_Advanced_Routing_...
Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
For your enviroment, since all peers are sharing the same AS, I believe you need to enable "as override" and "allowas-in" in your BGP configuration.
Please look the GAIA Advanced Routing to get the commands or to do through WEBUI.
https://dl3.checkpoint.com/paid/69/69d1c6899e768ea0687857ec55d723d9/CP_R80.40_Gaia_Advanced_Routing_...
Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Shawn,
If you wish to keep this purely iBGP setup, you may consider setting up a route refelector. "GAIA Advanced routing" briefly covers this subject.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Keeping all things BGP this would be the correct BGP term. iBGP assumes all peers to be fully meshed.
Assume we have iBGP talkers A, B and C.
B will not tell A about C routes learned from C.
B will not tell C about A routes learned from A.
The reason for this is since iBGP is assumed to be full mesh then B assumes C and A have BGP sessions with each other. Route reflector is the correct term to overcome this.
Sounds pretty good right? BTW I have no idea how to configure that in Gaia so.. uh.. maybe what firewall1-gx said is how to do that? 😄
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In GAIA it should be rather simple — if you want to make your CheckPoint a reflector:
set bgp internal peer ##.##.##.# peer-type reflector-client
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
thanks for the suggestions - I did try route reflector but had no luck with that but in fairness we didn't open a case with TAC for assistance as we got a lot of feedback that OSPF was the more common option and moved on to that.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Make sure cluster members have the same router-id. Seems like a common configuration issue. Once its set you can only change it by removing the ospf config.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That is one of the reasons to use cloning groups when using dynamic routing, so you don't configure things double and with mistakes.
