- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Security Gateways
- :
- Re: AD and Firewall integration
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
AD and Firewall integration
Hi,
One of our customer has Bluecoat proxy(for bandwidth management + URL filtering) and Palo alto(Application fw + IPS)firewall in their network. Network flow LAN users -->AD server -->Bluecoat proxy --> Palo alto firewall -->Internet.
Customer want to remove Bluecoat proxy and enable the same features on Palo alto firewall. But after AD integration with Palo alto fiewall - Distributed COM Users, Event Log Readers and Server Operators - these groups are not sync. Due to that even if system admin made changes in the AD user group that change is not reflecting in Palo alto user group.
In existing setup Bluecoat proxy perfectly working fine with AD user group sync.
Customer will not change any setting for the Distributed COM Users, Event Log Readers and Server Operators groups.
Now customer asked, If we replace Bluecoat proxy with Checkpoint URL filtering feature + AD integration, will it work?
Please suggest...
Thank you....
- Tags:
- ad query
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I assume that you by "AD Integration" you mean Identity awareness Software Blade.
To answer your question on whether it will work or not, one needs to see the exact use case. Most probably it will, but it is best to address this question to your local Check Point office or a relevant reseller, so they could look into details and advise.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I support Symantec (Bluecoat) SG proxys for many of our customers. From my point of view, you can't replace a Symantec SG with a Check Point. Even though I think Check Point is very good product, as a proxy it can't be compared to a Symantec SG.
If you intend to do that, you should do a POC.
See Migrating the Functionality of a dedicated Proxy Server to Check Point
or How to configure Check Point Security Gateway as HTTP/HTTPS Proxy discussion.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Currently no support for:
- TLS 1.3
- SNI
Only available with R80.30EA and above.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It would be a good solution to use the TEX appliance from Check Point with a Symantec (Bluecoat) SG.
More see here:
Symantec (Bluecoat) SG ICAP and Sandblast (TEX)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
But always do a POC and speake with your locale Check Point SE.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes. We will do POC to test the required features but before that customer want to know - Can Checkpiont firewall active sync with AD groups or is their any AD group dependency(already mentioned AD group name) as like Palo alto firewall.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If you mean the Palo Alto problem with adding users to a group in ActiveDirectory and this new users does not appear on the PAN-device... With Check Point this works, you add a user via ActiveDirectory to an AD-group and Check Point device knows this membership.
Wolfgang
