- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Improve Your Security Posture with
Threat Prevention and Policy Insights
Overlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hi team.
I am sure similar questions have been asked under different scenarios, and I apologize for repeating it again.
We are planning to move our Core to FW link from 1 Gig (RJ45) to 10 Gig (SFP). We have a cluster of 2 gateways in active/standby scenarios. They are configured with static IP's on the FW and on the core are part of a vlan. Our internal routes points to the gateway IP connected to the inside interface. What will be the best approach to getting this moved over with minimal downtime.
I cant really speak to your specific scenario, but I can tell you that every time I dealt with this sort of scenarion, as long as below things are in check, you will be fine, 100% (not necessarily in this order):
1) cabling
2) speed/duplex matching
3) IP addressing
4) VLAN config
5) routing
Perform the change on the standby member first.
Are the existing connections part of a bond/etherchannel at all?
Hey Cris, which plan in case of LACP bond interface?
if a remember correctly LACP bond is not possible with mismatched interface speed. With Active/Backup bond it should be possible, so the trick "first standby member then the active" is good, am i right?
If there are existing bonds and you are working with a cluster in theory there isn't a need to mix speeds.
On the standby you simply remove the old slaves and add new, failover and repeat (from memory).
Sorry for this late response but no they are not part of a etherchannel. The firewalls working in HA as a Active/Standby.
one thing to to consider here is whether you should set it up as a bond (LACP) with only one 10G link to start. That way, if you find in the future you need more, its just adding another 10G to your bond.
Avoid the same issue you ran into in the first place 😉
Great point @Scottc98
Still waiting to see a clear step by step instructions to move from 1 Gig interface to 10 Gig. We want to keep the IP's the same and configuration. Static routes which are not point to the 1 Gig interface should be fine and only those are pointing to the interface will need to be changed. Any other caveats tips. Thanks.
Thank you for that info, will do that with this move form 1 Gig to 10 Gig.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 26 | |
| 19 | |
| 11 | |
| 8 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 |
Wed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasWed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY