- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- SMB Gateways (Spark)
- :
- Re: Evaluation license contract
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Evaluation license contract
My smb appliance is 1595 , R81.10.15
“I have temporarily applied an evaluation license (all-in-one) locally since my one-year contract license has expired. However, I did not remove the existing one-year contract license information. When I run the cplic print -x command, only some of the evaluation license contracts appear.
In the Web GUI, the evaluation license contracts are displayed correctly, but in the CLI, they do not appear as expected. It seems that only the blades that were not included in the original contract license are showing.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Can you add a screenshot of the CLI output?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The items marked with a red box are evaluation licenses.
In the Web GUI, everything appears normal, but when checking in the CLI, the evaluation license contract does not appear for some of them.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
What is the effect, do the contracts work or not ? Like e.g. can you download TP updates ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nothing is malfunctioning or not working. It just appears differently in the GUI.
As shown in the screenshot, the device status is normal, and features like AV updates are working properly.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I would suggest to just forget it. All is working, and soon the box will have its new license, so why bother about a cosmetic issue at all ?
