Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Timothy_Hall
Legend Legend
Legend
Jump to solution

SD-WAN/ISP Redundancy and SecureXL

It is well known that traffic subject to the old ISP Redundancy feature in Active-Active mode can only be handled in F2F/slowpath. 

How does traffic subject to SD-WAN look to SecureXL on the gateway?  It appears that SD-WAN is not currently supported with UPPAK mode, which would seem to indicate that SD-WAN traffic being steered involves SecureXL probably in the Medium Path, and that SD-WAN steered traffic will not always be stuck in the slowpath.  Correct?

Attend my 60-minute "Be your Own TAC: Part Deux" Presentation
Exclusively at CPX 2025 Las Vegas Tuesday Feb 25th @ 1:00pm
0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
AmirArama
Employee
Employee

Hi Timothy,

Quantum SD-WAN is not affected by this limitation.
Traffic will be processed as Fast, Medium, or F2F, just as it would be without SD-WAN.

P.S. The UPPAK limitation has been resolved in JHF96.

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk180605

View solution in original post

2 Replies
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

I suspect if SD-WAN traffic were slowpath, there'd be a "known limitation" about it similar to ISP Redundancy.

0 Kudos
AmirArama
Employee
Employee

Hi Timothy,

Quantum SD-WAN is not affected by this limitation.
Traffic will be processed as Fast, Medium, or F2F, just as it would be without SD-WAN.

P.S. The UPPAK limitation has been resolved in JHF96.

https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk180605

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events