- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
This website uses Cookies. Click Accept to agree to our website's cookie use as described in our Privacy Policy. Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Upcoming Events
- Americas
- EMEA
- Czech Republic and Slovakia
- Denmark
- Netherlands
- Germany
- Sweden
- United Kingdom and Ireland
- France
- Spain
- Norway
- Ukraine
- Baltics and Finland
- Greece
- Portugal
- Austria
- Kazakhstan and CIS
- Switzerland
- Romania
- Turkey
- Belarus
- Belgium & Luxembourg
- Russia
- Poland
- Georgia
- DACH - Germany, Austria and Switzerland
- Iberia
- Africa
- Adriatics Region
- Eastern Africa
- Israel
- Nordics
- Middle East and Africa
- Balkans
- Italy
- Bulgaria
- Cyprus
- APAC
- Partners
- More
- ABOUT CHECKMATES & FAQ
- Sign In
- Leaderboard
- Events
What's New in Check Point SASE
Wednesday, 9 September @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
AI Security Masters
Implementing the AI Security Trifecta
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Hybrid Mesh
- :
- SASE and Remote Access
- :
- Integration Microsoft Entra(from Cisco) with Check...
Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×
Sign in with your Check Point UserCenter/PartnerMap account to access more great content and get a chance to win some Apple AirPods! If you don't have an account, create one now for free!
This widget could not be displayed.
1 Solution
Accepted Solutions
This widget could not be displayed.
3 Replies
Dear Mates,
We have Management Server running on the R81.20 version and Security Gateways with the R81.10 version.
Currently we are using CiscoDuo for MFA and now we want to move to Microsoft Entra for Remote Access VPN Users.
We are now currently using Identity Awareness Blade from local AD for all users.
As per the below document and video we have configured on Azure side and created Azure AD and Identity Provider objects in Smartconsole.
Using Azure AD for Authorization
Can you please suggest me for how to proceed for Remote Access VPN process?
If we do the integration what will be the impact on the local users like pro and cons?
Below is the current configuration screenshots in firewall.
Regads,
Saranya
Dear Mates,
We have Management Server running on the R81.20 version and Security Gateways with the R81.10 version.
Currently we are using CiscoDuo for MFA and now we want to move to Microsoft Entra for Remote Access VPN Users.
We are now currently using Identity Awareness Blade from local AD for all users.
As per the below document and video we have configured on Azure side and created Azure AD and Identity Provider objects in Smartconsole.
Using Azure AD for Authorization
Can you please suggest me for how to proceed for Remote Access VPN process?
If we do the integration what will be the impact on the local users like pro and cons?
Below is the current configuration screenshots in firewall.
Regads,
Saranya
Jump to solution
Jump to solution
Jump to solution
Integration Microsoft Entra(from Cisco) with Checkpoint
Integration Microsoft Entra(from Cisco) with Checkpoint
Integration Microsoft Entra(from Cisco) with Checkpoint
Dear Mates,
We have Management Server running on the R81.20 version and Security Gateways with the R81.10 version.
Currently we are using CiscoDuo for MFA and now we want to move to Microsoft Entra for Remote Access VPN Users.
We are now currently using Identity Awareness Blade from local AD for all users.
As per the below document and video we have configured on Azure side and created Azure AD and Identity Provider objects in Smartconsole.
Using Azure AD for Authorization
Can you please suggest me for how to proceed for Remote Access VPN process?
If we do the integration what will be the impact on the local users like pro and cons?
Below is the current configuration screenshots in firewall.
Regads,
Saranya
Dear Mates,
We have Management Server running on the R81.20 version and Security Gateways with the R81.10 version.
Currently we are using CiscoDuo for MFA and now we want to move to Microsoft Entra for Remote Access VPN Users.
We are now currently using Identity Awareness Blade from local AD for all users.
As per the below document and video we have configured on Azure side and created Azure AD and Identity Provider objects in Smartconsole.
Using Azure AD for Authorization
Can you please suggest me for how to proceed for Remote Access VPN process?
If we do the integration what will be the impact on the local users like pro and cons?
Below is the current configuration screenshots in firewall.
Regads,
Saranya
Dear Mates,
We have Management Server running on the R81.20 version and Security Gateways with the R81.10 version.
Currently we are using CiscoDuo for MFA and now we want to move to Microsoft Entra for Remote Access VPN Users.
We are now currently using Identity Awareness Blade from local AD for all users.
As per the below document and video we have configured on Azure side and created Azure AD and Identity Provider objects in Smartconsole.
Using Azure AD for Authorization
Can you please suggest me for how to proceed for Remote Access VPN process?
If we do the integration what will be the impact on the local users like pro and cons?
Below is the current configuration screenshots in firewall.
Regads,
Saranya
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'd start with this SK, which lists the various requirements for using this feature: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk172909
You can permit both authentication methods to be used.
I'd start with this SK, which lists the various requirements for using this feature: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk172909
You can permit both authentication methods to be used.
I'd start with this SK, which lists the various requirements for using this feature: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk172909
You can permit both authentication methods to be used.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The sk @PhoneBoy provided is exactly what you need to follow.
Andy
Best,
Andy
"Have a great day and if its not, change it"
Andy
"Have a great day and if its not, change it"
The sk @PhoneBoy provided is exactly what you need to follow.
Andy
Best,
Andy
"Have a great day and if its not, change it"
Andy
"Have a great day and if its not, change it"
The sk @PhoneBoy provided is exactly what you need to follow.
Andy
Best,
Andy
"Have a great day and if its not, change it"
Andy
"Have a great day and if its not, change it"
