- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
AI Security Masters E7:
How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for You
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
Good, Better, Best:
Prioritizing Defenses Against Credential Abuse
Ink Dragon: A Major Nation-State Campaign
Watch HereCheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
I have a VPN community for a B2B connection set up, with their VPN Domain containing a /21, that all works fine.
There is 1 IP address in that /21 that is for a public website that we don't want to to route over the VPN, and I'm trying to figure out how to exclude it from being routed over that VPN.
I've tried setting up a NAT rule to translate the source to an different IP than the one used for that community, but it still attempts to route over the VPN.
I've also tried setting up a static route, setting the next hop to the IP used as our default gateway.
How would I exclude an address from being routed thru that domain?
Thanks Danny! The SK for crypt.def was a little daunting and not clear how to specifically exclude an address, but that posts solution explains it very well!
I also just discovered that exclusion group objects exist. Do you know if using an exclusion group would cause any issues if I use that as the Satellite VPN domain?
It would be a simpler approach and be easier to share with my other techs.
As this article describes, groups with exclusions may have issues when used with VPN encryption domains. It might work, just test it and keep a close eye on the calculated result. I understand you are looking for an easy solution. However, your task it not easy by design. You could also create a group containing multiple network objects describing your /21 network without that single IP address in order to use that manually crafted network group as your new encryption domain. However, keep in mind Check Point performs supernetting by default, so you might still end up with a /21 encryption domain. That's why crypt.def is your friend.
I really appreciate the in depth response! I'll experiment with the exclusion group, but it looks like I'll likely need to go with defining an exclusion within crypt.def.
I'll try and update this post with my results once I've tested, for anyone that might stumble upon this post in the future.
I use this
> You could also create a group containing multiple network objects describing your /21 network without that single IP address in >order to use that manually crafted network group as your new encryption domain.
+ force the firewall to use a specific subnet editing user.def.FW1
TAC told me that exclusion group as encryption domain are not supported even if you can use them from Smart Console
>- Exchanged the network group with exclusions(not supported in the encryption domain) with a standard network group
Exclusion groups ARE supported for Remote Access VPN: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk167000
However, that’s relatively recent and for the specific use case it was designed for (Remote Access).
ok , i used them in s2s vpn
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
Tue 21 Apr 2026 @ 05:00 PM (IDT)
AI Security Masters E7: How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for YouTue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementTue 21 Apr 2026 @ 05:00 PM (IDT)
AI Security Masters E7: How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for YouTue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFTue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY