- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
AI Security Masters
LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate
When Prompt Injection Fails
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
I've opened an SR but I wonder if there are others with the same experience.
The fix described in sk173765 worked on R81.10 Take 30.
Since Take 45, the disconnections happen with the messages in cshell.elg even though the hotfix has been applied again on top of it.
Since the SR explains the hotfix is for Take 22 and above, I would think it stays applicable.
The new hotfix has been released. Please read sk173765 for details.
Hi @Alex-
Indeed, the hotfix from sk173765 stopped working some time ago. The issue is related to the JavaScript execution in the browser and does not depend on the gateway codebase. Most likely, it just so happened that the browser update came out around the same time when the Jumbo was installed.
We are working on a new approach, but there is no final solution yet. Please keep tracking sk173765. We will update it as soon as we have a new hotfix.
Thanks for the follow-up. I've indeed received custom files to try on the gateway until something permanent is put in place.
The first updated js package didn't prove conclusive and I've received yet another one from TAC.
I will test it this week.
The latest hotfix I've received seems to be the good one. No disconnections for at least half a day.
Hi @Alex-
Glad to hear that 🙂
hello, which one?
Hi we installed take 66 (R81.10) and the problem is not fixed. on going SR still
Thanks
Do you have the fix from sk173765 applied?
The new hotfix has been released. Please read sk173765 for details.
Hi there! As a workaround solution, you can use the IE11 compatibility mode in Edge.
Hi, we have been with E11 workaround for some time. We are still experiencing the problem even after recent jumpo hotfix. We are at R81.10 with take 66. We have a case remains opened with Checkpoint. Anyone has any luck with this issue? Thanks
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
Thu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEAThu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY