- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Access Control and Threat Prevention Best Practices
5 November @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Firewall Uptime, Reimagined
How AIOps Simplifies Operations and Prevents Outages
Overlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Spark Management Portal and More!
I don't want to configure split tunnel on the security gateway, I was wondering how I can exclude my subnet from full tunnel setup, is there any options?
As @PhoneBoy says, you can use 'exclude_local_networks_in_hub_mode' attribute in the trac_client_1.ttm to exclude a user's local network when they're connected to Remote Access VPN and using hub mode...
OR
You can go for a more manual and customisable approach where you manually exclude any host/network required, rather than just being limited to the excluding a user's local network.
If you'd like configure the Remote Access routing to essentially route all traffic to the gateway, EXCEPT a certain list of hosts/subnets, then you need to do the following:
To put this into a scenario, lets say you want all traffic to be routed to the gateway (like it is in hub mode), apart from 167.20.10.0/24 (some random network I thought of, insert yours here) - you want the clients to route this out of their local connection rather than via the security gateway. Following the scenario above and adding the 167.20.10.0/24 network to the 'ED-RemoteAccess_Exclusions' group will achieve this.
Hope that helps!
Luke
Let's put this in the Remote Access section where it belongs.
Looks like you can achieve what you're after by following this SK: Cannot exclude local network when connected to Remote Access VPN via Hub Mode
Thanks Dameon, I followed your SK but it didnt help.
When ever I try to access a local resource (local VM on my PC), the traffic is still being sent through to SG.
I am trying to find a solution where i can have split tunnel enabled for my VPN (exclude local subnet going through SG which is enabled for hub mode)
Perhaps there is an error in the SK or there is a different issue.
Have you opened a TAC case?
I have not as I dont have support contract with CP.
I there any solution where i can have split tunnel enabled for certain users on Checkpoint and other users will have to go through SG which is configured for Hub Mode?
As far as I know this is a global setting.
That means either all users can do it or none can.
Did you modify trac_client_1.ttm as described in the SK?
Your partner (or whoever you have a support contract they) should be able to open a ticket with us as needed.
Thanks Dameon
Is there any other option other than sk121766, to exclude local subnet from going through security gateways which is configured for HUB mode.
I want to have split tunnel enabled for only specific users and other users I they will have to go through SG which is configured for Hub Mode?
Is it possible to configure split tunnel for some and full tunnel for other users ?
As far as I know the settings apply to all users connecting to a given gateway but will double-check.
thanks
Looks like you can configure the TTM file per group.
In fact, the exact scenario you want is described in the following SK: Remote Access clients configuration based on group membership
Thanks 
Hi Jessica,
Did you got the solution for remote access vpn tunnel requirement?.
As @PhoneBoy says, you can use 'exclude_local_networks_in_hub_mode' attribute in the trac_client_1.ttm to exclude a user's local network when they're connected to Remote Access VPN and using hub mode...
OR
You can go for a more manual and customisable approach where you manually exclude any host/network required, rather than just being limited to the excluding a user's local network.
If you'd like configure the Remote Access routing to essentially route all traffic to the gateway, EXCEPT a certain list of hosts/subnets, then you need to do the following:
To put this into a scenario, lets say you want all traffic to be routed to the gateway (like it is in hub mode), apart from 167.20.10.0/24 (some random network I thought of, insert yours here) - you want the clients to route this out of their local connection rather than via the security gateway. Following the scenario above and adding the 167.20.10.0/24 network to the 'ED-RemoteAccess_Exclusions' group will achieve this.
Hope that helps!
Luke
 
					
				
				
			
		
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count | 
|---|---|
| 6 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | 
Wed 05 Nov 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EST)
TechTalk: Access Control and Threat Prevention Best PracticesThu 06 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
CheckMates Live BeLux: Get to Know Veriti – What It Is, What It Does, and Why It MattersTue 11 Nov 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - AMERTue 11 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CST)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - EMEAAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY